PoisonedV
Yeah, I'm a GIRL gamer, what of it?
uh, at least from my tenure in canada, thats not entirely surprising
Yeah, similar thing here in Edmonton; hundreds of people (including myself) sat on the lawn outside the government buildings.'Mr.Gonzo' said:Not here in Montreal its not. Its crazy to see all the people every year blazing like crazy downtown and not having the police to do nothing about it... They left us that day at least !
EDIT: Its mostly happening right there on the Mount royal in the middle of the city CODE
http://www.dam.brown.edu/people/glin/Trip_in_Canada/postcards/montreal/mont-royal.jpg
'klikklak' said:I wish I had some way to join in the celebration. Well there's an antinuclear demonstration tomorrow, maybe I'll meet some friends. Otherwise it'll have to wait until it's past mayday (which should be nice and baked and drunk).
BTW, family guy had a celebratory episode of sorts.
Antinuclear? Why? what do you want to use instead, covering every square inch of the earth in wind turbines
Klepto said:Thanks all for the answers relating to what 420 means. And well said klikklak!
not really. it just shows most of the fundamental misconceptions about nuclear power
'PoisonedV' said:'Klepto' said:Thanks all for the answers relating to what 420 means. And well said klikklak!
not really. it just shows most of the fundamental misconceptions about nuclear power
I must agree. After doing a bunch of research on it for class nuclear just seems to be the only viable answer. I don't understand what the issue is with building a bunch of 'em in semi-remote locations. Comparatively they produce much less pollution (the only bi-products being the spent fuel rods & low-level waste, both of which we have control over). I see it as a much more viable solution to the actual power issue here in the US, but I'm sure it won't catch on because of the economy. Investing in new technology puts more people to work (researching, developing, manufacturing) so I'm sure they'll go that route. Oh well... hopefully the solar tower will work out.
'PoisonedV' said:'Klepto' said:Thanks all for the answers relating to what 420 means. And well said klikklak!
not really. it just shows most of the fundamental misconceptions about nuclear power
I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what klikklak is getting at. It's about a lot more than that single issue. Check out the wikipedia page on eco-socialism. I wouldn't call myself an eco-socialist but I have some respect for their ideas.
Klepto said:'PoisonedV' said:'Klepto' said:Thanks all for the answers relating to what 420 means. And well said klikklak!
not really. it just shows most of the fundamental misconceptions about nuclear power
I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what klikklak is getting at. It's about a lot more than that single issue. Check out the wikipedia page on eco-socialism. I wouldn't call myself an eco-socialist but I have some respect for their ideas.
oh, trust me, i've seen this spectrum of ideas. i didnt place much validity in them :rolleyes: