Epicenter posted on Aug 26 2006 at 07:16 PM said:If the Dreamcast can have Nintendo's exact plus-shaped D-Pad, I'm sure it's not an issue to use the same. At any rate you can make a unique circular pad easily.
* U.S. Patent 4687200 - Nintendo's multi-directional switch
True if you are trying the approach of an internal D-pad option. It is racked with mounting and construction problems. The perfect solution is an EXTERNAL D-pad, you don't need to cut the case, remove the joystick from the motherboard, closing the case or be concerned about mounting precision, etc. You do however need to make an external D-pad flat and reasonably attractive!Epicenter posted on Aug 28 2006 at 03:52 AM said:I'll tell you this much, installing a D-Pad on your own is no easy job. I'm doing all the electrical aspects and soldering and a friend of mine who is much better at mechanical work than me is doing cutting, gluing and fitting things together-- and we're still having a hell of a time with it. It's all wired up and working correctly, but getting the damn case closed with the pad there is proving tricky, as is making it behave with enough sensitivity.
Epicenter posted on Aug 28 2006 at 01:23 AM said:Craig has told me GPH won't be changing the stick to anything else. He says there is no problem with it because he can play Battle Squadron for MD/Genesis effectively. It makes lots of other games difficult if not impossible to play, however. This isn't a good approach to the situation; by and large, the GP2X community does not care what one distributor thinks of the stick-- they care if it's a widespread problem with many users, and it is.
DaveC posted on Aug 28 2006 at 08:35 AM said:I have finished the board designs though for my pad kit. It will be fairly easy to install. Just de-solder the stick, put my module in its place and use the included metal template to cut the hole. The hard part will be getting a hold of Radek's chip as he doesn't seem to be around much. The problem is that I can never make enough. Maybe someone will take my kit and really mass produce it (Craig?) as I will make all plans public domain.
Epicenter posted on Aug 28 2006 at 07:44 AM said:The same functionality Radek's chosen microcontroller provides could be replicated with some logic; probably just a couple of gates would get the job done. Or even just transistors! He used it, I believe, because he wanted to add more functionality to it via the programmability of the chip. Maybe autofire or a Stick Push function, who knows. If you chose to omit it, I can't think of one application that'd be affected though. The only program that I can think of that won't see "UP and LEFT" as "UP-LEFT" for example is Gngeo2x, and I think it was recently fixed to support that.
Looking forward to seeing what you've cooked up; in the meantime I hope I can get my d-pad solution rigged up. It all works from an electronic standpoint, now it's just a matter of getting the little bastard mechanically stable.
Ok, instead of pursuing my own Dpad project I hereby volunteer to pitch in and help with yours. I will order a bunch of the chips, get a chip programmer, learn how to program it, and write the code. It shouldn't take me TOO long, most of the time will be spent waiting for stuff to be delivered, then learning to program PICs.DaveC posted on Aug 28 2006 at 08:17 AM said:You can probably use a few gates but the space for the chips is too much I think that is why Radek used his chip.
Well the good news is that I designed my module to be able to work with or without the chip.
If used without the chip all you have to do is solder bridge a few pads to enable it to work without it.