Oh come on guys. This is taking things a little far, don't you think? I know it's probably my fault for posting a topic that puts the two machines head to head, but I think everyone is being a little harsh on Nintendo's machine. Sure, it's got less to it than the GP32, the games cost money (just like commerical GP32 games do) and the screen sucks. But one thing you simply cannot deny is that the GBA has some brilliant games on it. They're not all SNES ports, either.
Golden Sun is awesome, a brilliant RPG, quite how you can consider it to be tedious I don't know. Same goes for Advance Wars - it's challenging and the learning curve is a little steep but it's not tedious. I found it addictive as hell. Then there's the Castlevania titles which are all excellent (and original GBA games), Zelda III which is worth buying again even if you've played the SNES version because it's one of the greatest videogames of all time, the stunning conversion of Street Fighter Zero 3, Tactics Ogre, Gradius Advance, Lunar Legends and many, many more. Personally I don't mind the SNES ports that much, I quite like being able to play these classics on the go. Until the GP32 can emulate the SNES to a decent degree I'll continue to play these titles on the GBA.
I think Axeman sums it up best:
"Can't be arsed with all this - I love my GP32, and the GBA is probably very good too - just more limited"
All I'm bothered about is my GP32 is sitting side by side with my GBA and both get the same amount of use.