mcobit said:It runs in dosbox on psp but far from playable:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vor-XcRC-Hg&translated=1
Then the answer is no. Unless they have made major advancements with Dosbox and haven't said anything. The thread on it had the PSP running Dosbox at 3000 cycles and the Pandora at 2000 cycles.
Edit: Sorry TylerAW, I didn't proof read and missed a 0. So the PSP is at 3000 cycles, not 300, and the Pandora is currently 2000 (without any further info).
Please re-read my post, I missed a 0.TylerAW said:I was asking about the Pandora running it not the PSP, and if the Pandora can do almost 6x the cycles than why wouldn't it be playable?!
'TylerAW' said:OMG Why the hell is it 1000 cycles behind?!
I'm just guessing, but it's probably because the PSP has had a lot of time in market for dedication from many different sources towards optimizations, whereas the Pandora hasn't been released yet and the DosBox port is a work-in-progress by a single person.
Dosbox probably doesn't make use of any of the Pandora's extra chips just yet. I'm sure the DSP and SGX can be used for something.'TylerAW' said:Well ok I guess it is a work in progress, is the Pandoras CPU hard to code for?
Kramy said:Dosbox probably doesn't make use of any of the Pandora's extra chips just yet. I'm sure the DSP and SGX can be used for something.'TylerAW' said:Well ok I guess it is a work in progress, is the Pandoras CPU hard to code for?
Once the devs have actual release hardware, they'll probably add some spiffy arm assembly to it.
Also using NEON instructions can give speed benefits for float-heavy applications.
EDIT: typo
'Kramy' said:Dosbox probably doesn't make use of any of the Pandora's extra chips just yet. I'm sure the DSP and SGX can be used for something.
Dropping the sound code onto the DSP makes a lot of sense to me. It seems like soft synth would be something it would be good at. Current code base puts all the sound synthesis on the CPU, and if you've played around with some games, you might note that sometimes turning the music off can make a lot of difference in playability.
That surprises me, the video showing off Warcraft 2 looked fine to me. But there may have been things not shown which were more taxing on the hardware.'Pickle' said:If you guys read through some of the previous discusions, i think where warcraft 2 was tried you will find that djwillis tried it and it didnt run fast enough.