sam fisher
Well-Known Member
In stress tests done by Ruckage the Wiz performed twice as fast as the GP2x...
'sold' said:I read somewhere that performance wasn't so crash hot. Got a link to any post about Ruckages' stress test?
There are figures from a while back that indicate that the wiz is not anywhere near twice as fast as the gp2x.
CODE
http://www.gp32x.de/board/index.php?showtopic=46502&st=0
Of course the wiz will outperform the gp2x. As it should being newer gear. But given the clock speed and the gpu, the improvement isn't that great.
I have with me two Wizzes. I have run the tests myself.
Edit: These tests provided game like scenarios and not emulator ones. Maybe emulators will suffer from some bottlenecks more.
What games are they? I pretty certain that no homebrew game is going to push the WIZ to its limits and unless the same games are run on the A320 its not possible to get an accurate comparison. What are you comparing the two WIZs for against each other?'Peter R' said:I have with me two Wizzes. I have run the tests myself.
Edit: These tests provided game like scenarios and not emulator ones. Maybe emulators will suffer from some bottlenecks more.
'Chip' said:'chad78' said:is the Dingoo A320 related to the Gemei X760+? I read that they use the same software, and have very similar specs. Anybody used both or compared them side-by-side?
They're definitely not identical, though they do appear to be binary-compatible. The x760+ has a larger display and the whole device (and therefore, board) is significantly larger. I can't find exact specs on the x760+, but I've also seen some posts like this one ( dingoo-scene.blogspot.com/2009/04/yi-chi-king-fighter-great-little-native.html ) that indicate x760+ apps will run on the A320, so the chips must be very similar if not identical.
Thanks Chip, do you (or anyone) know if the A320 is faster than the X760+? Basically I'm just trying to figure out which is the better value. I've found them both for basically the same price (in the mid $80s). From the specs I've found online, the X760+ has a 400 MHz CPU. Does anyone know the clockspeed of the A320?
chad78 said:Thanks Chip, do you (or anyone) know if the A320 is faster than the X760+? Basically I'm just trying to figure out which is the better value. I've found them both for basically the same price (in the mid $80s). From the specs I've found online, the X760+ has a 400 MHz CPU. Does anyone know the clockspeed of the A320?
The A320 defaults to 380 or 400 (reports vary), but it is reliably overclockable to 430MHz. I'm fairly certain the 760+ uses the same JZ4732 SoC as the A320. The only real differences boil down to these:
760+ has a larger display
A320 has better controls (real d-pad and has shoulder buttons), smaller size, and better battery life.
Other than that, they're functionally the same machine.
'DisgruntleElf' said:What games are they? I pretty certain that no homebrew game is going to push the WIZ to its limits and unless the same games are run on the A320 its not possible to get an accurate comparison. What are you comparing the two WIZs for against each other?'Peter R' said:I have with me two Wizzes. I have run the tests myself.
Edit: These tests provided game like scenarios and not emulator ones. Maybe emulators will suffer from some bottlenecks more.
I said nothing of that which you mention. Games easily can reach the potential of the console, my own game doesn't run fullspeed in the final levels on GP2x but does on the Wiz for example. I said I have two Wizzes, not that I compared them.
Sorry. My bad! Misunderstood.'Peter R' said:I said nothing of that which you mention. Games easily can reach the potential of the console, my own game doesn't run fullspeed in the final levels on GP2x but does on the Wiz for example. I said I have two Wizzes, not that I compared them.
Chip said:The original Wiz benchmarks were artificially low due to various issues, most of which have been resolved. The mmuhack specifically sped things up quite a bit. recent performance numbers are closer to what you would expect them to be based on clock speed: ~ double GP2Xperformance.
No, there were no "various issues", there was just the mmuhack one. I can't speak for everyone, but applying mmuhack most certainly did not make the app I've ported, Temper, twice as fast. The improvement was less than 50% still (over a 200MHz GP2X, with the Wiz at 533MHz - all fair play). The Wiz version is as optimized as the GP2X version. This is without doing any kind of work around for 240x320, but using 320x240 mode.
I'm quite concerned about sudden claims that a large sample of people are finding the Wiz to be 2x as fast with their applications. I'd like to see the parameters of these tests and the actual numbers.
dingoo has 2 buttons pressed at one issuegp2xs posted on Apr 16 2009 at 08:21 PM) In many situations the Dingoo is more convenient to use than the Gp2x. The Dingoo is a solid media player with built in battery that lasts a long time. The Dingoo has a functional Dpad. The Dingoo has a small(er) form-factor. The Pandora costs more than the Dingoo. The Dingoo has a small(er said:form-factor.
If the Dingoo got some proper emulator/software support it would hold its own against the Gp2x and the Pandora.