The entire "I don't want it so I don't want to pay for it" argument is a dead end. All it leads to is "I want this so everyone must pay for it because there's already stuff I don't want and still pay for". It's a dead end both ways (both for and against android or anything else) and utterly non-constructive. Bickering.
There's only one person who can definitively say if Android will be an "officially supported" OS option, same as with any hardware decisions. We can voice pros and cons here, but we can't really bargain with features since we (most of the community) are not making the decisions. So any "if this won't be in then that won't be in either!" or "if you get that then I must get this!" is a moot point.
The most constructive arguments here either show support for a feature with positive comments or raise justified concerns. Supporting one thing by speaking ill of other things is not constructive. I know I sometimes do that too; it's easy to slip there in heated arguments.
Currently the firmware development is, AFAIK, not funded at all, not counting the early pandora prototypes handed out. The entire work is being done by volunteers. ED sells the hardware, the community provides the software. How the community comes up with a piece of software is up to the portion of the community interested in said software. If there's not enough interest to make stuff happen one way or another, then there's not.