Nintendo
Nintendo Switch
Heyz, what are your thoughts on the Rudd Governments ridiculous tax hike on "ALCOPOPS" and the recent claim that if you drink more than 4 middies of beer or two glasses of wine you are binge drinking?
I'm interested in both legal age and all you kids who like a drink on the weekend (I'm not agreeing that you should be drinking below the age of 18 lets just make that clear)
First of all, here are my thoughts....
The Rudd Crusade are trying to tackle the problem of street violence which they believe is largely caused by teenage binge drinking. How do they think they will stop this issue? By introducing a 70% tax hike on all alcopops. For starters WHAT THE HELL IS AN ALCOPOP? I've never once heard someone refer to a Jim Beam or a Bundy as an ALCOPOP. So now instead of paying a sweet price of $16 for a six pack of Bundy I find myself paying $22, and a slab of Jack Daniels is now $105! I was a hard working, responsible adult who enjoys a drink on the weekends, only a couple beers or bourbons or so, and now because parents can't control their teens I am suffering for them. This is TOTAL CRAP!
This sudden large increase in price is having people go out and buy straight alcohol instead. Cheaper alternative, but this has a negative impact. Why you may ask? Well for us over the legal age each can or bottle of PREMIX (I refuse to call them alcopops) drink has a standard drink rating so you can monitor how much you have had, so you can know if you are safe to drive and drink responsibly etc. This is a standard and is easy to monitor and control. Well now I refuse to pay ridiculous prices for my booze I find myself mixing my own drinks, which is NOT controlled. I have no real way of monitoring how much alcohol I have in my drink as someone else may mix a drink for me a little stronger than I would myself, or maybe my second drink had less coke in it than my first etc...
So now instead of having a controlled substance, teenagers are mixing their own straight drinks and end up even worse off! Smart move Ruddster!
So if teens are the problem, upping the price on alcopops must be the solution. NO! How about tougher liquor laws, obviously they aren't tough enough if teens are constantly binge drinking. Upping the price stops nothing, it just makes consumers who are responsible and of legal age outraged!
Parents are the problem. Control your children. If your kid is having a party don't let them have booze. It is your responsibility to look after your own kids, not the tax payers paying for it in the long run.
Now the Rudd Crusade comes out saying 2 glasses of wine or 4 middies constitutes as binge drinking.....RIDICULOUS! This is all to support their plans to now up the price on beer and wines too. I know many people who go out for dinner, drink a bottle or two of wine and are perfectly responsible, I wouldn't call that binge drinking.
Personally I think it's a joke, and just another example of Rudd's lack of understanding of our country.
What are your thoughts?
I'm interested in both legal age and all you kids who like a drink on the weekend (I'm not agreeing that you should be drinking below the age of 18 lets just make that clear)
First of all, here are my thoughts....
The Rudd Crusade are trying to tackle the problem of street violence which they believe is largely caused by teenage binge drinking. How do they think they will stop this issue? By introducing a 70% tax hike on all alcopops. For starters WHAT THE HELL IS AN ALCOPOP? I've never once heard someone refer to a Jim Beam or a Bundy as an ALCOPOP. So now instead of paying a sweet price of $16 for a six pack of Bundy I find myself paying $22, and a slab of Jack Daniels is now $105! I was a hard working, responsible adult who enjoys a drink on the weekends, only a couple beers or bourbons or so, and now because parents can't control their teens I am suffering for them. This is TOTAL CRAP!
This sudden large increase in price is having people go out and buy straight alcohol instead. Cheaper alternative, but this has a negative impact. Why you may ask? Well for us over the legal age each can or bottle of PREMIX (I refuse to call them alcopops) drink has a standard drink rating so you can monitor how much you have had, so you can know if you are safe to drive and drink responsibly etc. This is a standard and is easy to monitor and control. Well now I refuse to pay ridiculous prices for my booze I find myself mixing my own drinks, which is NOT controlled. I have no real way of monitoring how much alcohol I have in my drink as someone else may mix a drink for me a little stronger than I would myself, or maybe my second drink had less coke in it than my first etc...
So now instead of having a controlled substance, teenagers are mixing their own straight drinks and end up even worse off! Smart move Ruddster!
So if teens are the problem, upping the price on alcopops must be the solution. NO! How about tougher liquor laws, obviously they aren't tough enough if teens are constantly binge drinking. Upping the price stops nothing, it just makes consumers who are responsible and of legal age outraged!
Parents are the problem. Control your children. If your kid is having a party don't let them have booze. It is your responsibility to look after your own kids, not the tax payers paying for it in the long run.
Now the Rudd Crusade comes out saying 2 glasses of wine or 4 middies constitutes as binge drinking.....RIDICULOUS! This is all to support their plans to now up the price on beer and wines too. I know many people who go out for dinner, drink a bottle or two of wine and are perfectly responsible, I wouldn't call that binge drinking.
Personally I think it's a joke, and just another example of Rudd's lack of understanding of our country.
What are your thoughts?