TelcoLou said:
Oblivion is worth the price of the console.
I will not pay about 880$ to play a game that I could play on my PC which by the way was cheaper.
daclassicgamingmaster said:
It's overpriced for what it does? Honestly, of all the possible arguments against the unit, you've chosen the absolute worst. It's a blu-ray player.....IT'S UNDERPRICED FOR WHAT IT DOES
That's why Sony is losing money on each console.
Now if you want to play the "over 600 euros for this whole device when I don't even want blu ray", that's another (and more solid) argument. I do agree that they should have made blu ray optional and charged something like 400 USD for a 20gb unit without the technology, and 600 for one with blu-ray. But hey, they did what they did.
Blu Ray is the UMD 2.0, I am sure of that. Paying extra for a feature that will be more or less useless soon.... won't be happening. Also, as already stated, no emotion engine.
There are enough arguments against it. I'm not saying I would not be interested in a PS3 under different circumstances. But as of now the price is too high for what it does, therefore the console is overpriced. Sony losing money does not change a thing; if the PS3 had a built in orange juicer, guitar tuner and filing cabinet those features would be just as useless eventhough they would surely raise the cost even more.
1. Just because you think Blu-Ray will fail doesn't mean it actually will. I would suggest you have a look at movie sales thus far. I read the article but cant find it now. It stated that at this point, Blu-Ray sales are beating out HD-DVD sales. Please note that this was BEFORE the European launch. Sony is satisfied with sales at this point enough to not worry about the future of the technology.
You may not care for it/want it, but others do. I know many people who buy BR movies on amazon.com all the time. Will it eventually fade out? I don't know. Is it the same (popularity-wise) as the UMD? Absolutely not.
2. The price is not too high for what it does. If you feel the price of BR technology (movies as well as the actual player) is ridiculous, that's another story and your opinion entirely. All I'm saying is that in comparison to prices as of now, the PS3 is actually underpriced. Your analogy is completely incorrect. If the PS3 had all those features, the unit would be even more
expensive, not overpriced. If the PS3 morphed into a car, boat, and hovercraft, and also played games, and the price was something like $2,000 USD, it would be
underpriced, but expensive. Just because it has a high price tag and technology you deem worthless, it is most certainly NOT overpriced.