Since we've been clogging up the forums and I'm going to go through the same points, I moved this to pm.
I insist you get your analysis correct before we move forward in conversation. I can't stand conversing with irrational people.
Your categorical sum analysis is objectively wrong. All it takes is one scenario where the analysis becomes absurd to prove this (counterexample).
Ex:
Every person finds every configuration acceptable.
In this example, summing the votes up in each category gives you 7 votes for every SD option, and 6 votes for every microSD. Or, alternatively, I believe you were attempting to categorize by the combination of internal/external and full-size/micro. I didn't read the full post once I saw you missed the point, but perhaps then you get 10 votes for microSD for every 8 full-size SD. Whatever the exact count, maybe microSD ends up winning.
The point is that your conclusion is based on an imbalanced analysis. If every person likes every configuration, how the fuck can one category of configuration come out winning over another??
When I said it was rigged, I didn't mean YOU rigged it intentionally, that was a mistakenly used word by myself. What I meant was the imbalance, and your attempt to analyze based upon any category is objectively wrong for this very reason.
Once you admit this, you have to roll back X number of publicly stated incorrect conclusions because nothing can stand on your faulty logic. I doubt you will do this.
