Gizmondo Executives


Everyone always says Gamepark gets their money by making simulators for the South Korean military or something to that effect. I'm thinking I don't believe that.

But anyway, this is pretty weird news but really not that surprising.
 
I mentioned this a couple of days ago in the Off Topic forum and got accused of having something against Gizmondo. Never mind that I have never posted any messages about Gizmondo or its corrupt executives prior to that.
 
slygamer posted on Oct 28 2005 at 03:20 AM said:
I mentioned this a couple of days ago in the Off Topic forum and got accused of having something against Gizmondo.  Never mind that I have never posted any messages about Gizmondo or its corrupt executives prior to that.

thats a bunch of crap people would accuse you for that. Its just common sense, how big is Tiger Telematic? I don't know, so i'll ask, but anybody with half a brain is going to know that NO company without hundreds of millions or possibly billions of dollars, like Sony, is going to be able to compete in the handheld market against Nintendo and now with Sony.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tiger t isnt that big...ive never heard of them before the giz came out...but my guess is they get thier money from organized crime or by selling drugs imo (it isnt the first time ive thought of this) :p ....but i do seriously doubt that (cuz why would mobsters sell handhelds?)
 
There is definatly something up with gizmondo...How the hell do they even think they can break even with what they have.

Does anyone know just how badly (or well?!?!?) gizmondo is doing?
Same for GP32...
 
Gizmondo's money losses are shocking, and their financial report is offensive to any investors (paying their wives massive sums of money, money 'missing', organised crime connections?).

I think we should have a guess gizmondos bankruptcy date. Its got to be in the next 12 months I'd suspect ;)
 
aQwaBlaz3 posted on Oct 31 2005 at 01:04 PM said:
Didnt Tiger make the Game.Com? I had one of those..it was so cool becuase of the touch screen...but the DS is 1000x better.

Different Tiger.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, that was Tiger Electronics--the toy company.

The touchscreen on that system wasn't nearly as high quality as the DS's. You weren't actually able to slide the stylus across the screen like you can on the DS. But I still like my Game.Com because it's unusual and a great example of what not to do. :p
 
shinneri posted on Oct 31 2005 at 08:51 PM said:
No, that was Tiger Electronics--the toy company.

The touchscreen on that system wasn't nearly as high quality as the DS's. You weren't actually able to slide the stylus across the screen like you can on the DS. But I still like my Game.Com because it's unusual and a great example of what not to do. :p

CORRECT and also, Game.com is great for Game show games. Wheel of Fortune is good as is Jeopardy. Resident Evil II was suprisingly good, but other than that, all the other games are pretty crappy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Angel posted on Oct 31 2005 at 05:39 PM said:
CORRECT and also, Game.com is great for Game show games. Wheel of Fortune is good as is Jeopardy. Resident Evil II was suprisingly good, but other than that, all the other games are pretty crappy.
Yep, REII was pretty cool on Game.Com. Sonic Jam, however, is probably the worst Sonic game ever made.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top