Faster? Blu Flu Nonflu


OmarNawaz

Active Member
Joined
May 15, 2004
Messages
663
who has got the fastest?

i just think the blu is less suitable for ocing because more power is used by the screen am i right?

i want the fastest gp32 i can get my hands on, cobbleware dude i aint bothered to find the thread but what was your highest speeds?


EDIT: sorryy for calling you cobbleware dude cant rember your name :p
 
White Demon posted on Mar 7 2005 at 05:46 AM said:
OmarNawaz posted on Mar 7 2005 at 04:13 PM said:
i aint bothered to find the thread

If you're too lazy to use the search function first, why should anyone tell you?

duude the search function will tell me how high the cobbleware dude got, i want to know what is faster overall flu blu non flu.


is that okay or shall i shoot myself now?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jcbnetwork posted on Mar 7 2005 at 06:07 AM said:
My original GP32 & my GP32 BLU+ both reach 166Mhz with no problems.

thanks for reply
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I believe the FLU and NLU units were the best for OCing. Some have been reported going over 250mHz.

Most BLU units could do 166 fine, some slightly higher. But apparantly a lot of BLU+ units have trouble doing anything over 160.

So if you wanna really overclock, best to lay your hands on a FLU/NLU.
But I'm still happy with my BLU at 166.
 
I got very lucky with my gp32 blu, It does 180mhz unmodded but most don't do that.
IT seems to me that with a Blu you get around 166mhz, whereas with an nlu or flu your speed is much more random
 
Back
Top