Faster? Blu Flu Nonflu


OmarNawaz

Active Member
Joined
May 15, 2004
Messages
663
who has got the fastest?

i just think the blu is less suitable for ocing because more power is used by the screen am i right?

i want the fastest gp32 i can get my hands on, cobbleware dude i aint bothered to find the thread but what was your highest speeds?


EDIT: sorryy for calling you cobbleware dude cant rember your name :P
 
White Demon posted on Mar 7 2005 at 05:46 AM said:
OmarNawaz posted on Mar 7 2005 at 04:13 PM said:
i aint bothered to find the thread
​

If you're too lazy to use the search function first, why should anyone tell you?
​

duude the search function will tell me how high the cobbleware dude got, i want to know what is faster overall flu blu non flu.


is that okay or shall i shoot myself now?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jcbnetwork posted on Mar 7 2005 at 06:07 AM said:
My original GP32 & my GP32 BLU+ both reach 166Mhz with no problems.
​

thanks for reply
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I believe the FLU and NLU units were the best for OCing. Some have been reported going over 250mHz.

Most BLU units could do 166 fine, some slightly higher. But apparantly a lot of BLU+ units have trouble doing anything over 160.

So if you wanna really overclock, best to lay your hands on a FLU/NLU.
But I'm still happy with my BLU at 166.
 
I got very lucky with my gp32 blu, It does 180mhz unmodded but most don't do that.
IT seems to me that with a Blu you get around 166mhz, whereas with an nlu or flu your speed is much more random
 
Back
Top