Sorry but i will never accept evolution as a fact. I am Maybe not the most intelligent person in the worl but i am not stupid. I knew before istarted saying these things that there would be not many if any that would agree with me
. Fossils are not proof.
I dont think this should be closed either as long as it dosnt turn into name calling and stuff. It woudl be good to hear from someone that agrees with me but i know there arent many
.
Not all scientists agree with one another i migth have a look to see if i can find some examples.
I hope people dont think im daft or anything as im not !!!
EDIT: Purple goat do you mean me ?
EDIT: Darwin also said that fossils do not prove evolution :-
"But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth? It will be much more convenient to discuss this question in the chapter on the Imperfection of the geological record; and I will here only state that I believe the answer mainly lies in the record being incomparably less perfect than is generally supposed;"
EDIT: Darwin correctly realized that there were four serious problems with his theory. :-
LONG before having arrived at this part of my work, a crowd of difficulties will have occurred to the reader. Some of them are so grave that to this day I can never reflect on them without being staggered; but, to the best of my judgment, the greater number are only apparent, and those that are real are not, I think, fatal to my theory.
These difficulties and objections may be classed under the following heads:-Firstly, why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?
Secondly, is it possible that an animal having, for instance, the structure and habits of a bat, could have been formed by the modification of some animal with wholly different habits? Can we believe that natural selection could produce, on the one hand, organs of trifling importance, such as the tail of a giraffe, which serves as a fly-flapper, and, on the other hand, organs of such wonderful structure, as the eye, of which we hardly as yet fully understand the inimitable perfection?
Thirdly, can instincts be acquired and modified through natural selection? What shall we say to so marvellous an instinct as that which leads the bee to make cells, which have practically anticipated the discoveries of profound mathematicians?
Fourthly, how can we account for species, when crossed, being sterile and producing sterile offspring, whereas, when varieties are crossed, their fertility is unimpaired?
EDIT: By the way im gettin this info from this website ----->
http://www.scienceagainstevolution.org