Which Music Player Do You Use?

What software do you use to play your digital music collection?

  • Kazaa

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • XMMS

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Musicmatch Jukebox

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Winamp

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Windows Media Player

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • iTunes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Quicktime Player

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other (state what you use below)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

...especially since they were never designed to be listened in album form, but rather performed live in front of an audience. Sigh...
 
Rico posted on Sep 15 2004 at 09:14 PM said:
...especially since they were never designed to be listened in album form, but rather performed live in front of an audience. Sigh...

Your point being? Don't go to concerts because the CDs of your favourite rock band were recorded in a studio?

Also, I have several Operas that have never and probably will never be performed in front of an audience as true operas.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I use itunes. It's got a nice visualizer, easy to use interface (but not to the point where there are barely any features) and has a built in store. All I wish is that you could make plugins and skins, like winamp.
 
Rico posted on Sep 15 2004 at 09:52 PM said:
Well you are a pretty dumb person. Hey, maybe you should use something called 'argument' to back up your claims. Mattmagoo pretty much summed it up with the skits thing. I do not want to listen to an album as if it were one giant 70 minute song.

think of a good album as a book. do you read a book by reading the middle, then the beginning, then reading the end? no. you fuck up the track list and you fuck up the story/concept, simple as that. i notice you said that you enjoyed black trash, the whole story is of some guy who just comes out of jail, sure you can listen to the songs in a random order but then you wont know what the fuck is going on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rico posted on Sep 15 2004 at 09:14 PM said:
...especially since they were never designed to be listened in album form, but rather performed live in front of an audience. Sigh...
To be fair at a music concert, they don't just randomly choose which songs they play, or which order they will do it in.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
bringoutthegimp posted on Sep 21 2004 at 12:25 PM said:
think of a good album as a book. do you read a book by reading the middle, then the beginning, then reading the end? no. you fuck up the track list and you fuck up the story/concept, simple as that. i notice you said that you enjoyed black trash, the whole story is of some guy who just comes out of jail, sure you can listen to the songs in a random order but then you wont know what the fuck is going on.
I listened to it once in order (the first time) as I usually do with albums. It was okay, nothing special. Now I just listen to the tracks in random order. Each one is enjoyable on its own and by itself. This is ideal, because I don't have to listen to the tracks in order each time. I can just pick one and it will still be enjoyable.

That's what I mean, I prefer albums that don't NEED to be listened in order, because while it might work the first time, it would get annoying to have to listen to the album in order EVERY time. So albums that are designed so each song works on its own as well are the better ones - Black Trash included.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
raven posted on Sep 14 2004 at 10:10 PM said:
Rico posted on Sep 14 2004 at 10:03 PM said:
Well if you don't need it, agreed, iTunes isn't for you. It isn't for everyone, after all it's much more of a digital jukebox than WMP, which is just a slightly glorified version of the classic playlist.
I mostly play my music by album because most albums have been recorded in a certain order for a reason and IMO sound better that way, so I don't feel the need to organise my music by anything else than artist, album and track.
I'm just using my computer as a cd-player with all music built-in, I navigate the old-fashioned way with a remote-control :)

Dozer: WMP is Windows Media Player, I don't use Winamp

I actually thought nobody else felt this way today - I think the completeness of an album is best expirenced on LP, since your pretty much forced to listen to an entire side at a time. :p
On that subject - I'm using Winamp and I've found that albums where 1 song is supposed to dirrectly continue into another, there always is a (very) little pause... I'm wondering if anybody know of a music-player that doesn't make this tiny pause.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ringo posted on Sep 21 2004 at 05:52 PM said:
jegHegy posted on Sep 21 2004 at 04:33 PM said:

Thanks...
That program actually does the trick. Tou can actually notice transition, but it's nothing like the "gap" in Winamp.
oh. :p i posted the url because i chose the "Other" option. glad you like the player though, it's lovely.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ringo posted on Sep 22 2004 at 02:40 PM said:
One thing I just noticed about Foobar200 is that it doesn't seem to have volume control... What's that about?
Yeah, I noticed that. Doesn't worry me as I have hardware controls my desk anyway.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ringo posted on Sep 22 2004 at 03:40 PM said:
One thing I just noticed about Foobar200 is that it doesn't seem to have volume control... What's that about?
preferences -> playback -> volume control :]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i use winamp 5.05 ... and i love the cd ripping feature with pro, real tv/radio streaming stuff, media library, some great skins etc etc etc
 
i use winamp 5.05 pretty because ther are soooo many plugins for it and so it will play pretty much anything and therefore makes making minidiscs easy and fast for example when i wanted the ff7 soundtrack instead of waiting a million years to download the hundreds of megs worth of mp3 etc i instead got a plugin for the psf (playstation sound format) lol
this means the files are well small like midi files and so a zip of the whole 5 1/2 hour soundtrack is only about 2 meg i think :D
same with snes ans nes etc it rocks
 
jegHegy posted on Sep 22 2004 at 03:39 PM said:
Ringo posted on Sep 22 2004 at 03:40 PM said:
One thing I just noticed about Foobar200 is that it doesn't seem to have volume control... What's that about?
preferences -> playback -> volume control :]

ahh... you're right. I doesn't seem that handy though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top