efegea
Active Member
zodttd posted on Mar 16 2007 at 12:47 PM said:
It's quake2 in the repository
Last edited by a moderator:
What Is The Status Of The Gp2x Quake Port?
- Thread starter Epicenter
- Start date
It's quake2 in the repository
efegea posted on Mar 16 2007 at 02:32 PM said:It's quake2 in the repository
Ooooo...
Last edited by a moderator:
rixed
Member
Yes this is planned, but no time for it right now.
(BTW, looked strange to saw a thread started by Epicenter)
(BTW, looked strange to saw a thread started by Epicenter)
zodttd
Solving your premature emulation since the Tapwave
Hi rixed!
Since this is a dead thread anyways, no worries going off topic...
How's gpu940 been going? By the look of the mailing list things are going well. I've been unable to find time to implement it in my own projects. I've been wondering if it will give improvements over HW SDL when there's only a single surface to be rendered.
Since this is a dead thread anyways, no worries going off topic...
How's gpu940 been going? By the look of the mailing list things are going well. I've been unable to find time to implement it in my own projects. I've been wondering if it will give improvements over HW SDL when there's only a single surface to be rendered.
rixed
Member
Hi Zodttd !
gpu940 is going more and more GL oriented. For instance, I'm about to remove keying and add a better blending support.
Unfortunately I have not much free time ATM, so everything is going very slowly.
About gpu940 versus HW SDL : I never used HW SDL, but like I said on the mailing list concerning supertux, I believe HW SDL is likely to be faster.
gpu940 is going more and more GL oriented. For instance, I'm about to remove keying and add a better blending support.
Unfortunately I have not much free time ATM, so everything is going very slowly.
About gpu940 versus HW SDL : I never used HW SDL, but like I said on the mailing list concerning supertux, I believe HW SDL is likely to be faster.
zodttd
Solving your premature emulation since the Tapwave
I'm leaning to the same conclusion. I think it's definitely a good thing for gpu940 to be focused on GL as 2D operations can be handled fairly well with HW SDL currently. Things might be going slow, but they definitely look like they're progressing in the right direction. Great work.
Lobo
Active Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2006
- Messages
- 527
So we might be getting a decent Quake 2 port soon? Excellent.
And that Yeti engine looks pretty cool: has it been ported to the GP2X since then or is it abandoned? It showed promise.
I know the GP2X is primarily 2D, and I love my 2D and retro stuff as much as anybody, but I'm just about ready to experience some good 3D stuff now!
What I'd really love is a 3D car game, like Ridge Racer or TOCA: surely a 3D racing car game would be less hardware intensive than a 3D FPS? At the moment the best I can get is playing the GT Advance games on Zodttds' excellent Gpsp port.
And that Yeti engine looks pretty cool: has it been ported to the GP2X since then or is it abandoned? It showed promise.
I know the GP2X is primarily 2D, and I love my 2D and retro stuff as much as anybody, but I'm just about ready to experience some good 3D stuff now!
What I'd really love is a 3D car game, like Ridge Racer or TOCA: surely a 3D racing car game would be less hardware intensive than a 3D FPS? At the moment the best I can get is playing the GT Advance games on Zodttds' excellent Gpsp port.
Megatog615
Member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2006
- Messages
- 163
What? No love for Quake I?
