Epicenter
Well-Known Member
You flatter me.
Well I don't want to buy a PSP. And the GP2x will never be capable of PSX, even at half speed. It can't handle Native 3D well. Egoboo using GPU940, was far too choppy and slow and I have now given up entirely on the GP2x. Maybe my eyes process images at 90FPS for all I know, but Egoboo was obviously not managed even 10. It was terrible, Payback, that I like, but to put it in "English" "It ain't gonna get no better than that mate".Sam, did you become an anti-GP2X zealot over night? The little bugger has A LOT of power under the hood, and has a lot of software to prove it. For all you know GPH won't ever produce anything at all. It's good to do with what you have, and that's not to say don't plan ahead, but don't be so ready to dismiss the present in favour of a future that may never be.
- Alex
I know its not for 3D, but it's terrible underpowered and has glaring flaws, that could of increased its potential so much. I am determined not to let GPH make the same mistake.
Actually it wasn't designed for games at all. :lol: It was designed as a portable media player-- and holy shit, what an awful media player. Honestly I don't blame it for 'not being powerful enough', I just have issue with the design flaws. A less powerful but more solid overall system, e.g. using a less flaky chipset, a decent method of directional control and a slightly more high quality overall fabrication would make a "superior" system even if the CPU was half the speed..You seem to dismiss the GP2X though. understand that the GP2X was never designed for PSX emulation or any kind of 3D software for that matter. It's a 2D handheld, and by the looks of it the last one of its kind
- Alex
I know its not for 3D, but it's terrible underpowered and has glaring flaws, that could of increased its potential so much. I am determined not to let GPH make the same mistake.
UNDERPOWERED? Except for the lacking 3D features - it's as powerful as a PSP...
I know that a 200-266mhz ARM9 may be roughly equivelent to a 8 bit mips at 333mhz in raw processing power, but the GP2x's blitter wasn't designed for games, this SoC from Magiceyes is a budget media player design, and the GP2x was engineered poorly as a budget media player.I know its not for 3D, but it's terrible underpowered and has glaring flaws, that could of increased its potential so much. I am determined not to let GPH make the same mistake.
UNDERPOWERED? Except for the lacking 3D features - it's as powerful as a PSP...
I think the DMA is a hardware fault - it works for some things, but not SD access (or something like that) and mysteriously disappeared in a later datasheet apparently. Like you said, the boot time still isn't as low as it can be, but there comes a point where to get it any faster, you'd need a different approach entirely (maybe some kind of XIP setup would be feasible? I don't know exactly how this works but I assume it works on NAND, though not many filesystem support it).By the way, what can still be repaired by firmware updates? What about the DMA? Boot time can (and has been) improved, MMU hack is a standart in many softwares, but what about the rest?
What is the main priority for me is to learn C++ (I come from MASM/Delphi) and start porting games over from the Amiga.
Jesus christ, the mean value for the total worlds intelligence just halved when you made such a ridiculous post. You could of at least used the correct punctuation, or structured your post, even, slightly.i hate the bootscreen , i wish someone would find away to change it....its a pity someone could'nt find a way to chip/add a mod chip to the gp2x to make it better, like they mod the ps1\ps2\xbox to play import games ....some thing like a piggy back 3d proseeor ontop of the second processor ...if you can see what im trying to say....
edit to add fantasies
Jesus christ, the mean value of the world's total intelligence just halved when you made such a ridiculous post. You at least could have used the correct punctuation, or even structured your post slightly.