He should go on Oprah and apologize to the women of the world.
Are you kidding?
Could he not turn the weapons of those who rage against him against themself?
Reading that article makes me believe that RMS has some sort of minor psychological disorder.
Some sort of social incompetence he is not guilty of.
Each organization now has to treat him with respect and must give him special treatment even.
How can those people rage against someone who might have a mental disorder. He needs to be protected!
That is a funny idea. RMS is a weird dirty man but he has lots of good things for libre software:
- dedicated
- uncorrupted
- intelligent
- capable of keeping ideologies apart so that we can support his libre software efforts without supporting his other ideologies
I do not think that he is mentally ill. IMO he is just a weird guy. Anyone who lets himself be deterred from libre software as a whole just because it's most effective proponent happens to be a weird old greasy man probably never really loved libre software in the first place.
Besides, RMS has a true UNIX beard so that is how we know that he is good.
I think he's just on the autistic spectrum. He certainly doesn't naturally understand that he might be upsetting someone by what he says or does.
I do not like labels like those. What does it mean to be autistic? It is just a name for a set of symptoms. We already know his symptoms, labeling it "autistic" does nothing useful. He is bad at social interactions, that is all. He clearly has good intentions, so we ought to be capable of forgiving his flaws without needing a special disease name for it. Let him who is without flaws cast the first stone.
I have to admit that I'm sorry for the FSF if they feel like they can't do without one 68 years old member.
Without Stallman there would not be a FSF in the first place. You are acting like he is just some random guy but he is literally the founder and the most important advocate of libre software in the history of libre software.
Besides, it is not about being able to. You are being too black-and-white. They could probably survive without RMS, but getting rid of the founder of the FSF and biggest proponent of libre software would be to their detriment. Just because they can do without does not mean that it will not hamper their effectiveness.
Also, RMS has been falsely accused. He has done nothing wrong. Why would they want to randomly cast out their founder? Just to prove that they can survive without, like some kind of dare game? It would be very improper to cast out their founder and steal his organisation and work just because they think they can.
Has he nominated a successor yet?
I do think about that sometimes, though. RMS may be one of the best or the best, but he will not live forever. Someday we may need a successor. But luckily not today!