sterling976
Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2008
- Messages
- 217
Maybe I wasn't quite clear -- the user doesn't necessarily even need to know there are command line parameters to configure, since most of the ports I've seen have been Pandora-specific. Since the hardware and OS are known quantities, you can distribute your app with a PXML file that contains a command string pre-configured for the device -- no need for the user to futz around with configuration settings unless they really want to.skeezix said:See, theres the rub -- try ti 'simplify' the front end by making users hack in command line settings.
This is easier than using a front end that is ctrafted to make it easy for the user for the given platform?
IT _can be_, but it is not always possible.
QUOTE
This is why I always say .. it is best to offer multiple ways; offer as complete a command line as you like (as a dev), and also have your own front end as you like. Then peopel can use generic front ends if they want.
This is how its always been and is exactly what you want
I couldn't agree more. As others have pointed out, there are some emulators that don't lend themselves well to the 'Boot the emulator into X application' paradigm. I was trying to point out, though, that the means for accomplishing the OP's suggestion are already available through configuration of the existing solution, if a given end-user so chooses. There's really no need for a formal UI standard.
Last edited by a moderator: