vaiovann
Still Fresh
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2007
- Messages
- 32
It is said that the defining difference between the "Russian" engineering principle, and the "American" principle, is this: When in that moment a decision to either add a feature or reduce complexity (and therefore a projects over all feature set), a Russian Engineer will generally side on the reduced feature set. Instead relying on it's abundant but hearty qualities to get it thru.
All stereotypes aside, I suppose the OP method is to test... and make damn sure that the product provided meets the Engineers own criteria first an foremost. I respect this.
However it may be a good faith effort on the part of the OP Team to (depending on the difficulty involved, and if financially productive) to let the most recent nub material thru. If this material stands up to say 300K cycles (but noticeably shy of the 500K mark), to just let it ride. I for ones would not mumble decent if a more "reliable" material was discovered and properly vetted in the mean time, while a large bulk of Pandoras met their collective owners... Just a thought.
All stereotypes aside, I suppose the OP method is to test... and make damn sure that the product provided meets the Engineers own criteria first an foremost. I respect this.
However it may be a good faith effort on the part of the OP Team to (depending on the difficulty involved, and if financially productive) to let the most recent nub material thru. If this material stands up to say 300K cycles (but noticeably shy of the 500K mark), to just let it ride. I for ones would not mumble decent if a more "reliable" material was discovered and properly vetted in the mean time, while a large bulk of Pandoras met their collective owners... Just a thought.