Pleng
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2006
- Messages
- 3,030
Tom` said:And because Rockbox may already have heavily-optimized decoders written in assembler for some common formats. I don't know how portable these would be, but it makes sense that an OS designed for digital audio players would be able to maximize battery life and CPU time.Pleng said:Elwing said:I guess he makes asumption on the 100hr anounced some years ago by craigx...
that said it's prolly easier to achieve that level of powersaving using something like rockbox rather than a full linux OS...
Because rockbox's power management features are better than Linux's?
Not unless the OS is able to make use of the power management features of the hardware, it doesn't.
Last edited by a moderator: