Wally
I am a banana!
I think a lot of you can remember how untidy the Pandora Wiki is, some things that you might notice in the Pandora Wiki that doesn't really appear to have any sort of standards.
Some of these things are:
• A lot of pages are inserted but not maintained because there's too much information (Emulator Compatibility Lists)
• A lot of links are dead
• Many Guides are out of date..
I was thinking perhaps we should have some sort of Guideline for content in the Wiki, sorta like Wikipedia but a bit less restrictive.
Some things we should consider:
• Debian OS configuration - Things that are in the Default Debian OS should not be on the Pyra Wiki UNLESS the article is Pyra specific. Reason being, we can help contribute to the Debian Wiki keeping that updated as the OS evolves.
• Emulator Compatibility Lists should not be on the Wiki but we should probably try and find a separate solution for that but only targeting emulators that aren't known to be working.
There's probably more we can add to the list later..
Thoughts?
Some of these things are:
• A lot of pages are inserted but not maintained because there's too much information (Emulator Compatibility Lists)
• A lot of links are dead
• Many Guides are out of date..
I was thinking perhaps we should have some sort of Guideline for content in the Wiki, sorta like Wikipedia but a bit less restrictive.
Some things we should consider:
• Debian OS configuration - Things that are in the Default Debian OS should not be on the Pyra Wiki UNLESS the article is Pyra specific. Reason being, we can help contribute to the Debian Wiki keeping that updated as the OS evolves.
• Emulator Compatibility Lists should not be on the Wiki but we should probably try and find a separate solution for that but only targeting emulators that aren't known to be working.
There's probably more we can add to the list later..
Thoughts?