Looking at the specifications of the current SoC used by the pandora (I believe its the OMAP3530?)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Instruments_OMAP#OMAP3
Im wondering now why a OMAP4430 or OMAP4440 wasn't used since logically wouldn't it allow for better emulation?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Instruments_OMAP#OMAP4
I mean 1.5Ghz dual core, theoretically wouldn't that be good enough to allow the Pandora into the realm of PS2 emululation? It really should not be tottaly out of the question to make a beefy(er) Pandora. Another revision would be nice even if it is not now or soon.
▲ original
▼ edit
I AM NOT SAYING WE NEED A PANDORA REDESIGN NOW IM SAYING WHY IS EVERYONE FREAKING OUT WHEN ITS MENTIONED LIKE ITS BLASPHEMY.
▲ Is there a sticky somewhere that says this? cause there should be if there isn't...
EDITED: Fixed for clarity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Instruments_OMAP#OMAP3
Im wondering now why a OMAP4430 or OMAP4440 wasn't used since logically wouldn't it allow for better emulation?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Instruments_OMAP#OMAP4
I mean 1.5Ghz dual core, theoretically wouldn't that be good enough to allow the Pandora into the realm of PS2 emululation? It really should not be tottaly out of the question to make a beefy(er) Pandora. Another revision would be nice even if it is not now or soon.
▲ original
▼ edit
I AM NOT SAYING WE NEED A PANDORA REDESIGN NOW IM SAYING WHY IS EVERYONE FREAKING OUT WHEN ITS MENTIONED LIKE ITS BLASPHEMY.
We got the green light from TI to make a new unit with this SoC, yep, but it NEEDS a complete board redesign, it's no drop-in replacement or anything... so it'll take a few years.
▲ Is there a sticky somewhere that says this? cause there should be if there isn't...
EDITED: Fixed for clarity.
Last edited by a moderator: