guilmon999
Still Fresh
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2009
- Messages
- 25
RenegadeChic said:this is a really really silly question
guilmon999 said:does this mean that we can get a faster pandora in the future?
That's why I originally posted it in the off-topic section.Sphinxter said:Totally off topic.
Neko said:That's why I originally posted it in the off-topic section.Sphinxter said:Totally off topic.
But I guess nobody wants to post there.
So you're trying to tell me that ARM processors are premature? It's no wonder x86 dominates (and penetrates) the market right now.RenegadeChic said:its definitely premature but also its just... well its silly to say "oh there are faster chips out now, does that mean there will be faster computers?". of course anything made in the future will utilise the best available things at the time. they're hardly going to stick old tech in for the hell of it.
Username said:So you're trying to tell me that ARM processors are premature? It's no wonder x86 dominates (and penetrates) the market right now.RenegadeChic said:its definitely premature but also its just... well its silly to say "oh there are faster chips out now, does that mean there will be faster computers?". of course anything made in the future will utilise the best available things at the time. they're hardly going to stick old tech in for the hell of it.
Given how long the Pandora took to make, I think they need to start planning the Pandora 2 now, if they want to have it done by 2011-2012.lulzfish said:I think he was saying that the asking about Pandora 2 was premature, which it is.
Neko said:Given how long the Pandora took to make, I think they need to start planning the Pandora 2 now, if they want to have it done by 2011-2012.lulzfish said:I think he was saying that the asking about Pandora 2 was premature, which it is.