Actually according to the Blog post, Bluetooth did cost more.PoisonedV said:The pandora has bluetooth, because, and I am too lazy to go looking for a quote, they found a cheaper/better wifi chip, that also came with bluetooth. Therefore, it was added with no extra cost.
MWeston said:BT was added for a few reasons
1. We got a good deal, but it did add a tiny bit of cost
2. OMAP host port only supports USB 2.0 HS mode (480Mb/s) which means all the bluetooth dongles I could find that had detailed specifications wouldn't work without going through a hub (which kinda kills that ultra portable stuff). It seems like most (all?) BT dongles are USB 2.0 FS mode (12Mb/s) because the more expensive electronics just aren't needed
3. See reason 2 for some unhappy customers forcing us to make a mk2 with BT internally and this would have cost more in the long run with a new PCB revision, changes to production line and changes to bill of materials.
4. Making competing devices look that much less interesting!
chad78 said:One thing I don't know if it possible or not - but it might be possible to use the Pandora as a wireless gamepad for your computer - but that's just a pointless harebrained idea I just had as typing this.
I did that with the iLiad once and it was easy, but I don't know how it could be done for non-linux hosts.
One of the ideas behind the original decision not to include Bluetooth was that if users wanted to use Bluetooth, they would be able to use a USB Bluetooth adapter such as this. However, MWeston discovered that the Pandora's USB host would not be compatible with most Bluetooth adapters, so the dev team made the decision to pay the cost for the Bluetooth (which they probably want to use as well) now rather than later.vaustein said:Fair enough. Reasons 1 and 4 above make sense. 2 and 3 are a little off; who are these "unhappy customers" that would "force" the dev team to add Bluetooth later? Regardless, it appears to have been a sound and thoughtful decision.