Christoph.Krn
Advanced Member
Thank you for your feedback.It's probably just the non-native speaker thing going on here, but for someone who claims not to be affiliated with the brand in question, your post doesn't half sound like an ad....
Just saying.
It's not a non-native speaker thing. My previous post sounds like an advertisement because I virtually talked about nothing but the Martin Fields screen protector, and since I'm extremely nitpicky and do not typically recommend things that are not at the very least damn near perfect, I simply do not have much negative to say about Martin Fields at this point. Neither was I able to find many negative claims about Martin Fields from other people back when I wrote the test, with the notable exceptions that some people think that the price is too high and/or do not want sharp reflections (for whatever reasons). Actually, I'd really like to hear about more negative experiences with Martin Fields.
The test itself is more neutral than my previous post because it is not focussed on the properties of the Martin Fields screen protector.
It's of course your decision whether or not you to trust me, but I would like to tell you anyway that if I wanted to artificially increase the sales of any company, then I would not do it in such a stupid and obvious way. (I don't have any intention to do so because I'm not one of the bad guys.)