Hey,ballmer,why Don't You Suck My Tiny Yellow Ball

[watoto]

http://www.gamerah.com/noticias.php?bias=180#180

i find it ironic he thinks psp will only house ps remakes,when all nintendo has done lately is rehash old snes and n64 titles on gameboy,gamecube and ds.worth reading

 

[Huxley]

Wow...he's honest, I'll give him that :blink:

 

[mr twit]

Haha, very funny interview

Edit: It's fake though.

i find it ironic he thinks psp will only house ps remakes,when all nintendo has done lately is rehash old snes and n64 titles on gameboy,gamecube and ds.worth reading

While the launch games of the DS did have a few remakes, as did PSP's launch titles, I'm quite sure the DS will have a lot more new games than the PSP, since the PSP needs as much money and time to make a game as a proper console game, whereas DS games are quick and cheap to make, thus the title Developer's System, especially since quite a lot of them will be 2D. So PSP will mainly get either ports of old games or watered down ports of new console games, I doubt very many producers will invest so much in a portable game when they could use the same amount of money and effort producing a console game which would sell a lot more.
Just my view, not trying to start an argument here.

 

[p j]

are loading times really that long?

 

[toxibunny]

what loading times?


and as far as I know, yeah, the interview's a spoof.

 

[watoto]

well,the way i see it,just because psp has superb graphic possibilities,doesn't mean that every game has to be in 3d.i'm sure 2d games will be made as well,and some are already in the lineup,like rpgs and puzzle games,or fighting games .it only means that if they want 2d graphics,it will be kick ass 2d,and if they want 3d graphics,it will still be kick ass 3d.
take lumines,is that a super 3d game?no,it's 2d puzzle game.
on the other hand,i can already see everyone trying really hard to implement some sort of touch screen functionality in their ds games,but it's like they're forced to.
to be really innovative,a ds game has to be conceived with really interesting touch screen concepts from the start,and have lots of them,otherwise it's just another handheld game with some extra.
so,at that point,why go for the ds when you can make an overall better game on psp.it doesn't have to be ps2 like graphics,but it can do that.i think it's more interesting.ds now has to have 3d games,if they wanted 2d graphics the gba could do those well enough.

 

[finty]

You completly contridict your self on the 2D point there, if we wanted 2d graphics we should get a GBA, but it is ok for PSP to have 2D graphics. Plus the DS's 2D capabilities are above that of a PSone, where as the GBA was SNES level.

Stop spouting shit.

 

[Dozer]

You completly contridict your self on the 2D point there, if we wanted 2d graphics we should get a GBA, but it is ok for PSP to have 2D graphics. Plus the DS's 2D capabilities are above that of a PSone, where as the GBA was SNES level.

Stop spouting shit.

​

Do you know how the 2d specs compare to the saturn?

 

[finty]

Probably poorly, Saturn was the king of 2D.

 

[Huxley]

Actually, Neo-Geo was king of 2D. So HA! :rolleyes:

 

[finty]

Yeah, but affordable 2D. So HA!

 

[Huxley]

Yeah, but some Saturn games now go for upwards of £60 a pop *tries to hide the fact he has no real argument*

 

[finty]

Yeah, like Metal Slug.

I have to install a switch soon...