sam fisher posted on Apr 9 2006 at 10:04 PM said:Even though both are exactly the same, its just the browser only displays that specific file type.
Squidge posted on Apr 9 2006 at 05:32 AM said:yup, vimacs is right (for once )
additionally, .gpe causes the file to appear in the "games" menu, whilst .gpu causes it to appear in the "utilities" menu.
GeminiDomino posted on Apr 10 2006 at 08:39 AM said:Not exactly. The extention has nothing to do with being executable in linux (chmod +x does that). It's just a GP2X thing, apparently only to decide which menu something shows up under.
Other than that, it's just an ELF binary, same as any other linux binary.
sand_man posted on Apr 10 2006 at 07:56 AM said:If you ask me it's kind of dumb. They should have just had a simple file browser where you can execute anything from it.
Squidge posted on Apr 10 2006 at 04:06 AM said:sand_man posted on Apr 10 2006 at 07:56 AM said:If you ask me it's kind of dumb. They should have just had a simple file browser where you can execute anything from it.
I think the idea was that by just showing .gpe/.gpu it skipped all the data files, so when you entered a directory, you didn't have to skip the first couple of pages to find the executable.
Squidge posted on Apr 10 2006 at 07:31 AM said:If you keep all your gpe/gpu files in the same directory (say the root), I can see the need.
Clearly, GPH wanted to make a clear distinction between "game" and "utility", otherwise they would just be one way to execute a file.