the_Diabologic
Member
btw, my blu+ overclocks to 166 just fine (not beyond that, tho)
evaunit01 posted on Jul 30 2005 at 01:27 AM said:ooh ooh osnes9x 0.2, I heard it's alot better!
but thanks for this, it's great to see people haven't just given up on the gp32 just because some new machine is on the way.
Like I said, no more blockiness with darker scenes. That's about all; I didn't notice any speed optimization or anything... aside from the higher clockspeeds, of course.Nekki posted on Jul 31 2005 at 01:29 PM said:Instead, another question: Does version 2 offer any performance benefits over version 1 when playing back at comparable clock speeds?
Nekki posted on Jul 31 2005 at 06:29 PM said:I'm having problems getting this to run properly - despite having several files inside the MOVIE directory, GPCinema 2 doesn't recognise that there's anything in there - am I doing something wrong?
EDIT: I found the answer in another thread, apologies
Instead, another question: Does version 2 offer any performance benefits over version 1 when playing back at comparable clock speeds?
the_Diabologic posted on Aug 1 2005 at 05:40 PM said:Nekki posted on Jul 31 2005 at 06:29 PM said:Instead, another question: Does version 2 offer any performance benefits over version 1 when playing back at comparable clock speeds?
yep, i ran the FF10_LEE.avi (~185kbps, 10fps, 300x220 - found on entware) in both @100Mhz
sound crackles and big slowdown at some scenes in gpcinema1, smooth playback all the time in gpcinema2
(another movie with ~270kbps, 15fps, 320x220 only runs smooth with at least 133mhz)
EDIT: also the first movie is encoded in divx, the other in xvid
sam fisher posted on Aug 1 2005 at 06:09 PM said:legal? either way i want a link
Sonic-NKT posted on Aug 2 2005 at 01:23 PM said:tried it now... but i have the bug others talked about, it just shows the gpmm directory but nothing inside and i also cant change that..
searched for an answer but couldnt find it.