mickb22
Still Fresh
Will we be able to port google android to the pandora? i was just watching the feed on g4 and i saw something about it. It looks interesting.
Then it might be interesting to port androids virtual machine to pandora. The rest of Android should be just Linux + a gui, so I don't think there is real need to reboot for itashdjones said:I'm sure we'll see Android homebrew just as with the Iphone, it's always nice to be able to run lots of software isn't it?
I think the possibility to run Android apps will be very interesting if this platform is successful. Although the pandora have neither accelerometer, nor compass (like the G1 phone), so it will limit the scope a little.fiveseven said:Isn't android mainly built for phones? Surely android on pandora would have very limited functionality without some kind of additional hardware?
Yes, but you need to port the framework as well to make it work well. And have a custom kernel; pandora could run just fine with android-activated kernel, even if you don’t use android vm/apps.conso said:Then it might be interesting to port androids virtual machine to pandora. The rest of Android should be just Linux + a gui, so I don't think there is real need to reboot for it
Dalvik designer said there’s no gain for JIT on an ARM CPU with little or no cache (you can’t fit much code in the cache). I don’t know how it compares with the pandora SoC L1/L2 cache.sindbad said:The Dalvik is very interesting and will be even more so when it gains a proper JIT. The file format is different in order to allow very quick loading.
No it isn’t LSB, it’s on the contrary a very custom os.Yannick said:Android is just Linux standard Base with an overly complicated but way cool eclipse inspired plug in GUI thingie
It should run just fine on the pandora, but it's been said already that it's up to Google to fully open source it.
aissen said:Yes, but you need to port the framework as well to make it work well. And have a custom kernel; pandora could run just fine with android-activated kernel, even if you don’t use android vm/apps.conso said:Then it might be interesting to port androids virtual machine to pandora. The rest of Android should be just Linux + a gui, so I don't think there is real need to reboot for it
I don't know how much they changed the kernel, but as I see it, most of Androids technology is abstracted through the virtual machine, so a proper ported and linked VM should be enough to gain all the possible features available to a device like the pandora.
Also, we should not mix features with dependencies. The Android-plattform is supposed to be very portable, so google will take care, it doesn't depend on accelerometers, gps or any other supported feature.
Things like accelerometer and gps could be either emulated with the analog controls or just attached to the pandora with an extension at pandoras back or bottom - or via bluetooth. I'd guess getting those devices to work in a pandora-dalvik-port, is mostly a matter of proper linking.
I must agree that all the android stuff is only suitable, if google makes it fully open source, but I have good faith in them
Yannick said:It should run just fine on the pandora, but it's been said already that it's up to Google to fully open source it.
According to their roadmap, they're working on that:
QUOTE
Source Code Release
We are currently in the process of preparing for the release of the source code. This includes a few key tasks:
* Selection of hosting infrastructure
* Updating the build infrastructure for general use
* Creation of a project governance framework
* Final examination of source code for release approval
* Physical upload and release packaging of the source code
This work is already under way, but since Android contains some 8 million lines of code, it's a lengthy process. We expect this process to conclude (and source code to be released) in Q4 of 2008.
You can find links to the parts that are already open here.
icurafu said:When someone is showing off their future andriod phone that cost them $179, you can tell them that it is the same as you Pandora, except you get good controls and 8 hour battery while they get phone functions built in.
I wanted to correct that since the official pricing, etc., has been announced, and we've had more than enough off-the-mark information (unwittingly) flung around lately.
But I still concur.
javaJake said:icurafu said:When someone is showing off their future andriod phone that cost them $179, you can tell them that it is the same as you Pandora, except you get good controls and 8 hour battery while they get phone functions built in.
I wanted to correct that since the official pricing, etc., has been announced, and we've had more than enough off-the-mark information (unwittingly) flung around lately.
But I still concur.
You've seen, that the package will contain "special" voice- and data-offers? Similar to the iphone, the real cost is a lot higher.
conso said:You've seen, that the package will contain "special" voice- and data-offers? Similar to the iphone, the real cost is a lot higher.
You'd think that was the case, but the new plans really are special. $25 for unlimited data and some text messages (doesn't say how many) and $35 for unlimited text and unlimited data. With the cheapest voice plan, you could have a G1 with unlimited internet for $55 a month. I'm paying twice that with Verizon right now.
fusion_power said:How useful/good is this Android? Any experiences? How could the Pandora benefit from Android compared to the standard Pandora OS? Is Android faster or has more useful features?