Definitly 3, maybe even 4 years? (wasn't the gp32 released in 2001?)Squidge posted on Mar 13 2007 at 11:50 AM said:Don't forget however that the GP2X will not last forever, there needs to be a steady stream of newer, more advanced consoles available. Every couple of years is probably the usual, given the time delay between the gp32 and gp2x (was it 2 years, or 3 years between them? I can't remember).
At the moment, the gp2x is still strong, but I wonder what will happen in a years time?
shinneri posted on Mar 13 2007 at 12:30 PM said:I desperately wanted a XGP mini. ...
So sad I'll never have one... ...
I like new things each year.icurafu posted on Mar 13 2007 at 11:26 PM said:While there are people who want to mainly use one device for 4 years to get the entire use of it, there are also gadget freaks like me who want something new every year.
If I have to wait much longer for an alternative to the GP2X, I'll probably just leave the scene. Pop back in every month of so to test the new software.
So, I'm terribly sad that GamePark is gone and even more upset that no other company has produced anything similar.
By the way, if GamePark is gone, How can a company be called GamePark Holdings? Which means to my understanding that they have some kind of an investment in GamePark.
Cruel posted on Mar 13 2007 at 12:22 AM said:Sad at if true.
And on http://www.gamepark.com/ somebody already selling shoes
Still hoping GPH will be more lucky
slaanesh posted on Mar 14 2007 at 01:31 AM said:I still think Gamepark should have created a Super GP32 instead of XGP, KiDS or whatever else they were planning.
Imagine a Super GP32 with an ARM920 400Mhz processor, 64MB RAM, SD card slot, 4 buttons and d-pad controller. Oh and backwards compatiability as there isn't really any new hardware just upgraded existing hardware. Except maybe the SD <-> SMC swap.
None of this is really outrageous and I'm totally sure it would have been a massive success.
Anyway, dream on. I shouldn't even be posting this kind of thing, should I?
GPH couldn't do it - GP owned the rights to GPOS (the OS on the GP32), not GPH.pocket posted on Mar 14 2007 at 09:05 AM said:A device 100% compatible with the GP32 would have been great. I never understood why GP or GPH did not that.
Are you saying the next gp*x will be in the same box, mostly compatible HW and a few extra things thrown in, like; more ram, an mmsp2+, a few usb devices (Wifi, bluetooth, camera, touchscreen??) etc. And basically the same OS with a few extra drivers... (any combination of the above features of course) Sounds like a plan to me...craigix said:The speed things are moving now with handheld technology every year may become the normal life span, but not so much a totally new system each year but more like a backward compatable PC-ish upgraded system.
A totally upgradable handheld, can you imagine?
woogal posted on Mar 14 2007 at 10:35 AM said:GPH couldn't do it - GP owned the rights to GPOS (the OS on the GP32), not GPH.pocket posted on Mar 14 2007 at 09:05 AM said:A device 100% compatible with the GP32 would have been great. I never understood why GP or GPH did not that.