gotwake424
Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2011
- Messages
- 380
Looked around and didn't really see anything about it.
http://scp.indiegames.us/guides.php
Thanks in advance
http://scp.indiegames.us/guides.php
Thanks in advance
Looked around and didn't really see anything about it.
http://scp.indiegames.us/guides.php
Thanks in advance
I don't see how you think that the Pandora isn't capable of running this at a reasonable speed if properly ported. It doesn't look any bit graphically superior to Quake 3 level graphics and that runs full speed without overclocking.
I don't see how you think that the Pandora isn't capable of running this at a reasonable speed if properly ported. It doesn't look any bit graphically superior to Quake 3 level graphics and that runs full speed without overclocking.
Purely based on the lovely particle effects.. is there anything currently running on Pandora that looks anywhere near as good as this..? if so iv'e missed it.. come on potential porters prove me wrong!
EDIT:
Well possible..? (if of course it's portable) does look phenomenal though
I know this is an old thread, but Freespace has had several graphical enhancements since it was open-sourced. While running FSOpen with all the extra effects, models and textures might be beyond the Pandora's capabilities, I think there's a reasonably good chance that it could run something closer to the vanilla version of the game without too much trouble. It was originally designed to run on late 1990s PCs, after all.Looked around and didn't really see anything about it.
http://scp.indiegames.us/guides.php
Thanks in advance
Don't know much about the necessaries here, but i would say purely based on the screenshots that the Pandora has a 0% chance of being able to run this at anything like a playable speed.. overclocking or no overclocking, not so sure that the mythical DSP would be of any help either..