Na-Noo said:
Huh, all but out? And that's your answer why we shouldn't care about what we tell new comers?
Yet we still tell people to order as there's still a good chance they can get hold of one.
Just because we've possibly become lax in our advice, it doesn't mean that we should not tell the people who still have a chance to get hold of one the correct advice.
Can I have a stab at this? I think the reason that people have tended to be more "gung-ho" about advising "newbies" to get hold of Pandoras is multifold. It would include at least (IMHO):
The Pandora has had an extra year of development, during which we have heard of specific things which probably would have been a stumbling block for newbies (like Wifi not working properly/smoothly/easily a year ago) but which have now been fixed. Like circuit board revisions (we've passed what, about 3 or 4 board changes since Sept 2008?).
We've had another year of experience of other devices - which nowadays need so many frequent updates that it's frankly incredible to me... if you told us that you had to flash your washing machine last week I doubt there would be many that would disbelieve you. We've gotten used to the idea that technology is, well, a bit crap really and needs to be fixed regularly (but cheaply!).
We've had numerous occasions where things have looked so bad for OpenPandora that there has seemed to be a real risk that they could go bankrupt, taking our money and any hopes of ACTUALLY getting our Pandoras down the drain with them. So we have, collectively, become something of an unpaid slave-labour sales force for OpenPandora, out of self preservation. We WANT this project to succeed, and natuarlly do what we can to try and ensure this.
We have, of course, also got excited by any number of videos being posted, and promises of ports of our favourite games (Aliens Vs Predator, anyone?) being made by the time we get our grubby mits on the hardware. So... we get excited. Excited people want to share their joy (it's one of the few redeeming features of mankind, IMHO).
Where are "newbies" coming from? Has Pandora been advertised on national telly? In Argos catalogues? No... when it's been seen, AFAIK, the target audience so far has mostly been gadget or tech freaks. People who may well not be Linux folk (I am not one, for example) but who are already engaged in the techno-junk world of game computing. So it's seemed increasingly reasonable to assume that anyone coming here before the product has even been released is at least PARTIALLY tech savvy, and not someone still wet behind the ears. Not, perhaps, folk we'd have recommended the device to a year ago - but a year ago there wasn't even a hint at a console-style simplified front end IIRC.
Those few "reasons" encompass a lot of individual instances, and probably miss out on quite a bunch even though I've tried to make them blandly generic... but the main thrust of my argument is that we didn't change from one position to the other overnight. Over the last year, the device has seemed to improve, our understanding of the device has improved, and our understanding of who is arriving on these boards has hopefully improved. It's NOT a brilliant polished final article - but neither (IMHO) is Windows Vista. It does, however, look like "on release" it's going to be an awful lot more useable than it would have been a year ago. A year ago the software would have been in a horrible state, and the number of applications ready to use on it would have been tiny compared to what it is (albiet hidden away, out of sight) today. So we have gradually relaxed our caution on who to advise purchasing the product.
Bugs? You betya. But then - Vista is still being patched too.