skeezix
Internal Development
Getting back on track..
If a "DOS emu" was ported (ie: an XT or 286 emu, for instance), then it would run DOS on it (FreeDOS or a real DOS), and then you could run Windows 3.1 on it; ie: DOS and Windows aren't open source, but thats not relevent since they'd be running on the emu. More to point is getting DOSBox up to speed or writing a new x86 emu as DOSBox is traditionally very poor performer on low end devices.
Windows 3.1 doesn't provide DOS; it runs on top of DOS.
jeff
If a "DOS emu" was ported (ie: an XT or 286 emu, for instance), then it would run DOS on it (FreeDOS or a real DOS), and then you could run Windows 3.1 on it; ie: DOS and Windows aren't open source, but thats not relevent since they'd be running on the emu. More to point is getting DOSBox up to speed or writing a new x86 emu as DOSBox is traditionally very poor performer on low end devices.
Windows 3.1 doesn't provide DOS; it runs on top of DOS.
jeff