Emnasut said:
Nope. I know it looks like a plane, but well the main use would be for flying so it should be aerodynamic

It just can drive also (and has to up to 120 kmh for lift off) and is able to take off and land on a normal road. Here's a picture with tests in a wind tunnel:
So it's a drivable plane, not a flying car. There are big differences between the two, and the difference is what usually trips up people trying to come up with a "flying car" design: they end up designing a drivable plane.
Simply put: a plane needs a "runway" for liftoff and landing. To really be considered a car, you need to be able to drive out of your driveway and just take off.
Of course, you also need a pilot's license; a driver's license just won't cut it. The reason for that is that taking off too fast, too slow, wrong angle, against the wind, with the wind, across the wind, no wind, along the trees, all these things can affect the lift you get, and if you aren't trained, you will crash and die. And what happens if you come in to land at the same time that others do? Where do you land during rush hour?
A flying car, like the kind out of movies, uses some kind of anti-gravity tech, unaffected by most wind conditions. You want to go to the store, you pull out, hover up a bit, your car scans the skyway for other cars, and lifts straight up into it when it's safe. You want to land, you simply go home, and settle straight down in your driveway. No need to worry about accounting for wind in your lift. When someone has achieved this, the ability to lift off and land from a standstill and fly without worrying about how the winds will affect your lift (just your course), then you will have a flying car. Until then, such a vehicle with wings is a drivable plane.