Exophase
Nothing good will ever come of Exophase.
torpor said:You're pretty sure about a lot of things, I have read.
Was right about those two things at least ;P
torpor said:Do you also then account for the differences in i/o throughput on your PC, somehow? Not that I feel like arguing you with you particularly, but I come from a world where you always test first and foremost on your target hardware.
You do too feel like arguing with me, don't lie to me!
I don't need to account for differences in anything on my PC because it's the Pandora that's being tested. The netplay situation should be reasonably symmetrical. Then again that's really just for getting things off the ground - when you really want to test netplay that's when it's time to ask other people to help you. Or does you also account for the differences in I/O throughput on a local network, somehow? (I assume you intend for people to play on The Internet, not your network)
torpor said:Of course, and you can also just hack SDL-based projects on some other platform and gain a lot of glory from doing a port here and there too, but in my case I want to be able to contribute to the Base OS while also working on user space apps, without interruption. Decades of experience has led to the policy of maintaining different hardware configurations for these two realms, and its worked quite well so far .. so ..
Yeah yeah you're a true hacker and not just doing the easy ports for the Mad Props, not really sure what the application to what I said is but that's all good stuff. Be that as it may, I think the kernel hackers have generally been okay with one Pandora and will probably continue to feel this way. Maybe their context switching between what they work on is not as fine grained as yours, dunno.
And sorry, but my eyes kinda gloss over a little when people start talking about decades of experience with anything. It's a total kneejerk reaction. I can't help it!
torpor said:When you have a softsynth and want to see that it syncs well with another copy of the softsynth running on another Pandora, its best to have two complete instances of the hardware to test against, lest you run around trying to work out why you're getting better throughput for the job on the mega-PC in comparison to the real hardware you're intending to target .. I'm sure if you'd thought about that, you'd understand.
No, I don't understand your argument at all, please accept my apologies on this one :/ Why would the same thing running on two Pandoras every NOT synch well?
torpor said:Like I say, you have certainty on a lot of things but certainty isn't the only way to paint the bike shed .. I don't think you're really being honest in looking at my situation: I have two Pandoras because it supports my development efforts, and all I really want to do with the Pandora is develop cool, new, things for it .. so yeah, I got two to help with that, and in fact having two Pandoras definitely helps when I need to switch on new things, test them, verify against a known end-user configuration, and so on ..
Yeah I'm pretty dishonest, I guess.. and something about bikesheds (seriously I dunno, maybe it's just because I can't sleep that I don't know what that cliche means here, or maybe my inability to sleep is why I'm taking out posts on you, dunno)
I just think it's conceited of you to claim that you with two Pandoras is more productive than two decently enthusiastic workers with a Pandora each. You can argue this however you want, I probably won't change my mind. And really there isn't supposed to be something wrong with you having two, but I'm trying to make a point here... because I get this vibe that you're chiding people for doing what they want with their Pandora and not doing what you want, or following more the example you're setting (or think you're setting). When I see you talking about all the things having two helps you with I see someone who has two because it makes him happier, and I think that reasoning should be left at that without bringing utility into it. I think you, as someone who clearly is super into this hacking stuff and derives an awful lot of fun from it should step back and cut the people at large some slack for not feeling exactly the same way as you do. If a platform isn't getting a lot of dev love then sorry, it just means the love probably wasn't meant to be - and you can to some nice positive things to try to play matchmaker and stimulate that but deriding people, sorry no, I'm just not very comfortable with that.
There's really nothing like people telling you you're not doing what they want to make you feel like doing things even less.
Last edited by a moderator: