Nova said:
?"personal home computer."
iprice said:I wonder how far this will go, as most manufacturers add provisos and cautions into their guarantees/warrantees/manuals etc. stating that features and specs. may change without notice etc. etc.
Was it ever really marketed as a -
?"personal home computer."
I've not checked my PS3 manual and I don't particularly care about using Linux (or "OTHER OS") on it, or that I've lost it. I'm sure SONY will wriggle out of it somehow.
Wait, what? Does that mean it applies to my Slim also?That website said:The firm is seeking to prosecute the case as a class action on behalf of everyone in the United States who bought a PS3 between November 17, 2006 and March 27, 2010
I agree that they can be extremely useful; I'm just saying that what's in the fine print can't be something that goes against a law or something like that because then it's useless. But if there's nothing technically wrong with what they did and they used the right special sauce in the manuals/what-have-you, then they probably will win.iprice said:1. Actually provisions and black and white text ARE extremely useful in court. Many, many companies get out of paying huge fines due to small print, as do insurance companies etc.
I know courts don't care, I was just responding to where you and many other people have said they don't really care about otherOS support. Though the people that annoy me are the people who say that because they don't care about otherOS, it doesn't matter what sony did, but that's not what you're saying, so I can respect you just not caring about the otherOS support.iprice said:2. Courts don't care about principles. All they will care about is what is stated in black and white - both as part of the statute of limitations and the manuals and warranties of products. On the outside of the box it might say "OTHER OS" available, but the manual may clearly state that the available features may change - not just to combat pirates, but sometimes to enhance the abilities of the host machine; to allow it to do things that weren't possible. SONY will no doubt have a strong argument and a whole host of lawyers to support their argument as to why they removed Linux and the ability to add another/different OS.
Reo said:Wait, what? Does that mean it applies to my Slim also?That website said:The firm is seeking to prosecute the case as a class action on behalf of everyone in the United States who bought a PS3 between November 17, 2006 and March 27, 2010
Shouldn't do. Your console never had the ability to use linux, so nothing was taken from you.Nova said:Reo said:Wait, what? Does that mean it applies to my Slim also?That website said:The firm is seeking to prosecute the case as a class action on behalf of everyone in the United States who bought a PS3 between November 17, 2006 and March 27, 2010
They aren't very specific, but I imagine so, since it's technically a PS3.
I hope so anyway, cos mine is also a slim
Goity said:Shouldn't do. Your console never had the ability to use linux, so nothing was taken from you.Nova said:Reo said:Wait, what? Does that mean it applies to my Slim also?That website said:The firm is seeking to prosecute the case as a class action on behalf of everyone in the United States who bought a PS3 between November 17, 2006 and March 27, 2010
They aren't very specific, but I imagine so, since it's technically a PS3.
I hope so anyway, cos mine is also a slim
Nova said:Goity said:Shouldn't do. Your console never had the ability to use linux, so nothing was taken from you.Nova said:Reo said:Wait, what? Does that mean it applies to my Slim also?That website said:The firm is seeking to prosecute the case as a class action on behalf of everyone in the United States who bought a PS3 between November 17, 2006 and March 27, 2010
They aren't very specific, but I imagine so, since it's technically a PS3.
I hope so anyway, cos mine is also a slim
Yes, but that isn't specified on the site. My receipt also says 'PS3 CONSOLE', so they'll have a hard time proving otherwise.