Prophet
God I'm old.
Digital Awakening posted on Oct 5 2005 at 12:32 AM said:Don't know if anyone have mentioned this because I'm to tired to read all posts so I skipped a few.
GP2X may have only 2 200MHz CPUs but don't forget they they have 2D acceleration so for 2D games they will really shine compared to a 400MHz CPU without 2D acceleration. This is why GPH didn't put in a 400MHz CPU. It's right there in their FAQ had you bothered to take a look.
http://www.gpx2.com/support/support_sugest...bunho=1&part=02
"We inform you that 400Mhz without 2d accelerator would rather be lower than 200Mhz."
That can easily be interpreted as a smokescreen.
Because it's very application dependent. In some cases that will be true, 200Mhz + 2D acceleration might be faster than 400Mhz without 2D acceleration. But in other cases, like some emulators where you have multiple CPU's to emulate, the bottleneck could be in CPU speed and not rendering speed.
I personally think they had video playback in mind when they wrote that - the GP2X can probably do a fine job of decoding video, certainly better than a 400Mhz PDA without any 2D hardware to help. But for tasks that need raw number crunching that 2D accelerationmay not help much. That's where the second CPu comes in though, and hopefully the whole mess combined will work out to be pretty good in the end. I think it will.
Last edited by a moderator: