Search results

I asked him twice. So far - silence. You may try yourself. His e-mail is franxism@gmail.com Maybe if more people started asking him, he would finally stop violating GPL.

OK. Now, let's assume I am violating GPL by not giving you sources. I violated an agreement on which I received the code, which is between me and original author. Not between me and you. So, you cannot sue me. Only the author of the original code could. BTW: EOT unless you bring some copyright...

That's very interesting... :> Could you explain on which basis? You're not a side in the dispute between copyright holder and copyright breacher. So, you have no right to sue anyone. Every court will just reject your case for formal reasons. Unless your jurisdiction pursues these offences ex...

Well... You cannot really do anything about it unless you hold copyright on the original source. So the only ones that can legally do something are the original authors of PCSX and PCSX-r. They can ie. sue the copyright infringer. You as a user can only... nothing.

No. psx4all is based on outdated code. This one is the same code the new psx4droid is based on.

http://repository.maemo.org/extras-devel/pool/fremantle/free/source/p/psx4m/

I'm sorry I tried to help. I will shut up now.

In OpenGL you may request non-interpolated texture scaling, so with a bit of tweaking in SDL backend you can achieve sharp hardware pixel doubler. (It's the default mode on N900)

Read the first sentence as: "the reason your "UAE [...]", and you will know why I was confused. I guess I should take a break and rest a bit...

I was pretty sure I was using UAE core, until john4p invalidated that statement. gprof is showing that most of the time is taken by graphics emulation. I should investigate more how much different is UAE4ALL OCS emulation to UAE. While porting fixes I got an impression that it is not that...

My N900 is clocked at 600MHz. It has a lot of background tasks and PulseAudio server running - I guess a lot less than Pandora OS. Why then UAE-core underperforms on Pandora and is fine on N900? I would like to understand why there is so much difference in UAE4ALL performance to standard E-UAE...

So why I don't see any difference in speed to FAME or Cyclone version?

Now I'm confused. First you said that I have FAME core in N900 version, that's why I do not see any difference to the Cyclone core version. Now you say that I don't have FAME core in N900 version, that's why Project X is working fine. Which core is it then?

Mine is from Skid Row, cracked by FFC/FASTEST. And I don't have Team17 logo before "Accessing Disk". Nothing about Special Edition in cracktro.

This might be the case. Is there a way to check it?

I will repeat very slowly: ;) 1. UAE4ALL ME (for N900) with Cyclone core - Project X does not work. Cyclone prints "unsupported branching (or something)" to console and hungs. 2. UAE4ALL ME (for N900) - the same exact code, but with FAME core (the only change) - Project X works fine. The only...

This is a long standing debate between pragmatic and academic approach. I personally prefer "mostly works" than "can't be done perfectly -> doesn't work at all". ;)

This is what happens with Cyclone core on N900. It prints a message of unsupported branching or something. That's why I dropped Cyclone. With FAME core it works fine on N900.

Project X works fine on FAME core.

Yes. You're right. It's top-left corner. Anyway - if the OS starts with this idea of default position and emulator assumes so, this is going to work in most cases.