ITS EVERYONES FAVOURITE THREAD


finally got mine, thanks to trooper well here it is:
untitled.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
Rico posted on Mar 24 2004 at 10:00 PM said:
With that kind of trippy-ass shell replacement shiznit I'd grab another OS with more customisability in by default :)
why use another OS if i can customize this one to my needs?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jegHegy posted on Mar 25 2004 at 01:33 PM said:
Rico posted on Mar 24 2004 at 10:00 PM said:
With that kind of trippy-ass shell replacement shiznit I'd grab another OS with more customisability in by default :)
why use another OS if i can customize this one to my needs?
Namely because it would run faster and would be less of a hack job. But I was saying what I would do - not asking you to do anything. So your question is irrelevant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rico posted on Mar 25 2004 at 03:50 PM said:
jegHegy posted on Mar 25 2004 at 01:33 PM said:
Rico posted on Mar 24 2004 at 10:00 PM said:
With that kind of trippy-ass shell replacement shiznit I'd grab another OS with more customisability in by default :)
why use another OS if i can customize this one to my needs?
Namely because it would run faster and would be less of a hack job. But I was saying what I would do - not asking you to do anything. So your question is irrelevant.
the point is that blackbox eats about the quarter of the amount of RAM explorer used. OWNED

:p
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jegHegy posted on Mar 25 2004 at 09:28 PM said:
Rico posted on Mar 25 2004 at 03:50 PM said:
jegHegy posted on Mar 25 2004 at 01:33 PM said:
Rico posted on Mar 24 2004 at 10:00 PM said:
With that kind of trippy-ass shell replacement shiznit I'd grab another OS with more customisability in by default :)
why use another OS if i can customize this one to my needs?
Namely because it would run faster and would be less of a hack job. But I was saying what I would do - not asking you to do anything. So your question is irrelevant.
the point is that blackbox eats about the quarter of the amount of RAM explorer used. OWNED

:p
And I bet the REAL BlackBox WM in linux uses up quarter of that again. PWNED

:O
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rico posted on Mar 26 2004 at 05:49 PM said:
jegHegy posted on Mar 25 2004 at 09:28 PM said:
Rico posted on Mar 25 2004 at 03:50 PM said:
jegHegy posted on Mar 25 2004 at 01:33 PM said:
Rico posted on Mar 24 2004 at 10:00 PM said:
With that kind of trippy-ass shell replacement shiznit I'd grab another OS with more customisability in by default :)
why use another OS if i can customize this one to my needs?
Namely because it would run faster and would be less of a hack job. But I was saying what I would do - not asking you to do anything. So your question is irrelevant.
the point is that blackbox eats about the quarter of the amount of RAM explorer used. OWNED

:p
And I bet the REAL BlackBox WM in linux uses up quarter of that again. PWNED

:O
let's not go into linux vs windows though. what matters is that my desktop looks the way i want it to and actually SAVES RAM.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top