bah! just put it in a single comon archive that's it...Vimacs posted on Sep 27 2004 at 10:26 PM said:only for stupid machines
synkro posted on Sep 27 2004 at 10:30 PM said:bah! just put it in a single comon archive that's it...Vimacs posted on Sep 27 2004 at 10:26 PM said:only for stupid machines
don posted on Sep 28 2004 at 01:19 AM said:Well, most windows archivers can uncompress tarballs, the problem is just that Mirko's naming is a bit unconventional (I don't know about the archives on sourceforge, but the older ones on his page resulted in the file "gp32_SDK", leaving open that it is a tar archive).
Because tar is an archive format (Tape ARchive) and bzip is a compression. You have to use them both together (in the *nix world combining seperate apps that each do one job very well is often prefered to an all-in-one app that is average at several jobs).synkro posted on Oct 1 2004 at 10:08 AM said:don posted on Sep 28 2004 at 01:19 AM said:Well, most windows archivers can uncompress tarballs, the problem is just that Mirko's naming is a bit unconventional (I don't know about the archives on sourceforge, but the older ones on his page resulted in the file "gp32_SDK", leaving open that it is a tar archive).
why can't he just put it in one signle archive then? why TAR and BZ2 ?
woogal posted on Oct 1 2004 at 10:40 AM said:Because tar is an archive format (Tape ARchive) and bzip is a compression. You have to use them both together (in the *nix world combining seperate apps that each do one job very well is often prefered to an all-in-one app that is average at several jobs).synkro posted on Oct 1 2004 at 10:08 AM said:don posted on Sep 28 2004 at 01:19 AM said:Well, most windows archivers can uncompress tarballs, the problem is just that Mirko's naming is a bit unconventional (I don't know about the archives on sourceforge, but the older ones on his page resulted in the file "gp32_SDK", leaving open that it is a tar archive).
why can't he just put it in one signle archive then? why TAR and BZ2 ?