Linux-SWAT
Forum Addict!
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2010
- Messages
- 9,188
It was sad to read them.It's regrettable the number of people complaining about "OpenPandora" as a company when they really mean gbax. I'd love to at least try to correct them but I know it would fall on deaf ears, though not without reason to be fair.
start here: http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3389321&threshold=0&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=42616345Which comment plz ?
I remember replying to that comment without leaving my name there (as it should've been clear, it was a follow-up conversation), so you probably picked the correct one.Was the third one the 'magic turning point' comment? (also visible as a reply to the comment I linked to above) I wondered if that was yours but there is no identifying information in the post.
-- Neelix
Well, "we" as the team behind the Pandora is correct, though.Ed, you should really ask Craig to stop using the word "we" all the time without explaining who "we" actually is.
...which is exactly what new customers will not know, therefore the definition of "we" needs to be specified in both cases.Well, "we" as the team behind the Pandora is correct, though.
"we" as "our company" not.