Should The Un Impose Sanctions On North Korea?

Should the UN impose sanctions on North Korea?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Joined
Jan 12, 2005
Messages
982
Age
30
Location
Peterborough England
I dont think North Korea can realli do much. i mean yeah. they have a army of 1,000,000 and maybe nuclear missles. but if they start anything then they would get there ass kicked. China wants the wests money not the wests blood so they would not help North korea in a war.

RETARD


Impose Sanctions

End aid

sorry. i dont realli know much about this so no flaming plz thats just what i think from what i know
 

dsraa

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2004
Messages
286
rabbits with hats posted on Jul 7 2006 at 03:13 PM said:
I dont think North Korea can realli do much. i mean yeah. they have a army of 1,000,000 and maybe nuclear missles. but if they start anything then they would get there ass kicked. China wants the wests money not the wests blood so they would not help North korea in a war.


Impose Sanctions

End aid

sorry. i dont realli know much about this so no flaming plz thats just what i think from what i know
That's basically right, their reasons for doing this is so they get more recognition, and more money for aid. They are trying to appear bigger and more of a influential power of the region. atleast that's how it seems to alot of people I know...I could be wrong though.

DSR
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Hanz™

FIGHT THE POWER! :D
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
2,577
Age
33
Location
fan
Website
Visit site
Mr.Jabberwocky posted on Jul 7 2006 at 03:04 PM said:
Of course they should. The USA is the only country responsible enough to possess a nuclear deterrent. Any other country might end up dropping them on cities full of civilians. The USA would never do that.....again.......would they ?
I don't know a single country responsible enough to possess a nuclear "deterrent".
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Vimacs

Don't be evil!
Joined
Oct 23, 2003
Messages
5,762
Age
33
Location
Germany
Website
Visit site
Exactly!
But as more countrys have them the more unlikely it is for someone to us ethem as they know it would be a war without any "winners".
 

Jarska333

What do you want?
Joined
Nov 10, 2004
Messages
3,606
Location
Sovjet Finland
Website
Visit site
Sanctions worked so well against Saddam. While his people flourished, his palaces and army degraded, to the point where he had to personally beg on the streets of Baghdad. "Will dictate for food"... Pitifull sight he was.
 

Hanz™

FIGHT THE POWER! :D
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
2,577
Age
33
Location
fan
Website
Visit site
Impose Sanctions
End aid
I know that those are both likely the only thing that can be done, other than military action which is even worse.
But the problem is the people that are harmed by that will not be the N. Korean government, more likely their innoccent people.
 

Mr.Jabberwocky

Bloke with a brick on his head
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
402
Website
Visit site
Hanz™ posted on Jul 7 2006 at 05:15 PM said:
Mr.Jabberwocky posted on Jul 7 2006 at 03:04 PM said:
Of course they should. The USA is the only country responsible enough to possess a nuclear deterrent. Any other country might end up dropping them on cities full of civilians. The USA would never do that.....again.......would they ?
I don't know a single country responsible enough to possess a nuclear "deterrent".
In case you missed it that was intended as an ironic statement. The country that nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki, (like one A-bomb on a secluded military base would not have got the message across), are now afraid that other countries can not be trusted with that kind of power. In my opinion that was a crime on a par with the holocaust.
Sanctions against a totalitarian regime are obviously futile. They are only going to be effective if the government can be swayed by the suffering of the people.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

sam fisher

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2004
Messages
9,452
Location
Bristol, UK
Website
blog.peter-r.co.uk
Mr.Jabberwocky posted on Jul 8 2006 at 10:50 AM said:
Hanz™ posted on Jul 7 2006 at 05:15 PM said:
Mr.Jabberwocky posted on Jul 7 2006 at 03:04 PM said:
Of course they should. The USA is the only country responsible enough to possess a nuclear deterrent. Any other country might end up dropping them on cities full of civilians. The USA would never do that.....again.......would they ?
I don't know a single country responsible enough to possess a nuclear "deterrent".
In case you missed it that was intended as an ironic statement. The country that nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki, (like one A-bomb on a secluded military base would not have got the message across), are now afraid that other countries can not be trusted with that kind of power. In my opinion that was a crime on a par with the holocaust.
Sanctions against a totalitarian regime are obviously futile. They are only going to be effective if the government can be swayed by the suffering of the people.
Considering America wasn't originally part of the war, I think that Little Boy and Fat Man were a stupid idea. THey could have just dropped them in secdluded areas as you say. I think it was more of "Show Off" thing. Like.

"we can make atomic bombs with 50 kiloton warheads, thats not exactly a lot but its still uber cool!"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Hanz™

FIGHT THE POWER! :D
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
2,577
Age
33
Location
fan
Website
Visit site
Mr.Jabberwocky posted on Jul 8 2006 at 10:50 AM said:
Hanz™ posted on Jul 7 2006 at 05:15 PM said:
Mr.Jabberwocky posted on Jul 7 2006 at 03:04 PM said:
Of course they should. The USA is the only country responsible enough to possess a nuclear deterrent. Any other country might end up dropping them on cities full of civilians. The USA would never do that.....again.......would they ?
I don't know a single country responsible enough to possess a nuclear "deterrent".
In case you missed it that was intended as an ironic statement. The country that nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki, (like one A-bomb on a secluded military base would not have got the message across), are now afraid that other countries can not be trusted with that kind of power. In my opinion that was a crime on a par with the holocaust.
Sanctions against a totalitarian regime are obviously futile. They are only going to be effective if the government can be swayed by the suffering of the people.
Yeah sorry dude. I only read the first two sentence and only saw you were being sarcastic after posting.
I agree.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
B

Ben_Unbannned

Guest
For the 10+ people who posted in this thread, I've just got one thing to say to you all.
If you don't like me, then don't post in my thread{s}. Thank you. ;)
 

sam fisher

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2004
Messages
9,452
Location
Bristol, UK
Website
blog.peter-r.co.uk
Ben_Unbannned posted on Jul 8 2006 at 11:28 PM said:
For the 10+ people who posted in this thread, I've just got one thing to say to you all.
If you don't like me, then don't post in my thread{s}. Thank you. ;)
I'm sorry. This isn't your forum. I'll post in a thread of which I find the topic relevent and requiring of a reply whehter I like the starter or not.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

CABBAGES

Very Active Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,151
Location
SCOTLAND
Website
Visit site
north korea should be able to make and test stuff as long as they go about it the right way. I think if america attacks another country or starts another war we should impose sanctions on them. :p .

We are all fucked anyway there will be a big huge war soon and most of us will die.
 

Jarska333

What do you want?
Joined
Nov 10, 2004
Messages
3,606
Location
Sovjet Finland
Website
Visit site
Ben_Unbannned posted on Jul 9 2006 at 01:28 AM said:
For the 10+ people who posted in this thread, I've just got one thing to say to you all.
If you don't like me, then don't post in my thread{s}. Thank you. ;)
I propose, that the UN impose sanctions on you. :ph34r:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Klown

Trolling on the Spiderweb
Joined
Jul 10, 2003
Messages
1,271
Location
Happy Magic Grand Land
Website
klown.info
CABBAGES posted on Jul 9 2006 at 10:07 PM said:
north korea should be able to make and test stuff as long as they go about it the right way. I think if america attacks another country or starts another war we should impose sanctions on them. :p .
Firing long range misslies into the sea of JAPAN and threating nuclear war is the right way of going about it. Making weapons while your countries' citizens don't have electricity for the night and when your people are starving is awesome. So is threatening countries and demonising them within your own borders who you have to beg them for food aid.

North Korea is a hole and you people seem to have no sense of relative importance. It's all well and good to believe that America shouldn't be allowed missiles and such but putting America and North Korea on the same level, reagardless of your opinion of America is extremely fucked up.

EDIT:
CABBAGES posted on Jul 9 2006 at 10:07 PM said:
We are all fucked anyway there will be a big huge war soon and most of us will die.
Between who and why will we all die?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top