Khellros
Still Fresh
One of the few features of the gp2x there *hasn't* been a lot of discussion about lately is the photo viewer. Perhaps it is not very important to people, but it is to me. Hence, I decided to do some tests to try to figure out the optimal format (resolution, compression, etc) to convert my photos to.
Objectives: to make images that are quick to load, with maximum quality on the gp2x screen, and as small as possible without sacrificing quality.
To my surprise, it turned out resolution of the photos viewed on the gp2x really affect the image quality on the screen (i.e. there is a difference in appearance between a large image placed on the gp2x and the same image downsized on the PC and then put on the gp2x). Images that are just exactly 320x240 turn out very soft, even blurry. By contrast, large images (> 640x480) turn out extremely sharp, even aliased.
After testing many different settings, my preference is to put photos as jpegs with quite a low compression factor (quality 8 in Photoshop) and a resolution of 480x360.
Anybody else have preferences or thoughts about using the gp2x photo viewer? For reference, I have the original firmware.
/Khell
Objectives: to make images that are quick to load, with maximum quality on the gp2x screen, and as small as possible without sacrificing quality.
To my surprise, it turned out resolution of the photos viewed on the gp2x really affect the image quality on the screen (i.e. there is a difference in appearance between a large image placed on the gp2x and the same image downsized on the PC and then put on the gp2x). Images that are just exactly 320x240 turn out very soft, even blurry. By contrast, large images (> 640x480) turn out extremely sharp, even aliased.
After testing many different settings, my preference is to put photos as jpegs with quite a low compression factor (quality 8 in Photoshop) and a resolution of 480x360.
Anybody else have preferences or thoughts about using the gp2x photo viewer? For reference, I have the original firmware.
/Khell