http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/cortex-...ssor-available/
85 microwatts/MHz (0.085 milliwatts)
Interesting
85 microwatts/MHz (0.085 milliwatts)
Interesting
Last edited by a moderator:
Nope. More like 85 uW. 85 milli-milliwatts.'lulzfish' said:and many processors run around a gigahertz.
So this is like 85 mW? That's not too bad.
color me deeply impress if it could reach a ghz : )'Tinnus' said:0.085 mW * 1000MHz = 85 mW for 1GHz
Ideally, yes it is. P = fcV^2. The problem is that in cases of higher clocks, you almost always need a higher voltage and will have higher losses due to heat and leakage, breaking the ideal equation.'lulzfish' said:Oh yeah, power consumption isn't linear to clock speed.
Of course, you'd think the manufacturer would say something when they published a spec like "blah blah microwatts per megahertz"
But then again, ViewersAreMorons. Even though some of them are probably EEs.
oh god how did that fad get all the way over here'PoisonedV' said:Cool pandora related thread bro
From what this quote says, doesnt that mean It would be more possible for an N64 emulator on the pandora, if this was used? Am I right?'ninjamonkey' said:QUOTE
The exceptionally small silicon area, low power and minimal code footprint of the processor enables developers to achieve 32-bit performance at an 8-bit price point, bypassing the step to 16-bit devices.
'Patrick R Ludvigsen' said:oh god how did that fad get all the way over here'PoisonedV' said:Cool pandora related thread bro
Fad? what?