Grench
Forum Addict!
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2008
- Messages
- 6,629
I realize that F2FS is the latest darling disk format of the Linux world. However, living on this bleeding edge has some pretty serious limitations and drawbacks.
Installing the latest available-to-me OS image onto a 64GB SDXC card results in only being able to use/see the first 8GB of the card within the OS. Where we're using apt from Debian repositories for software installs, more space in the rootfs would be a good thing. I can foresee users installing to up to 1TB cards.
Where the frustration hits: Trying to resize or grow the F2FS partition to 'fill the card'. Yes, I figured out how to do it by soft deleting the partition, creating a new bigger partition, formatting to F2FS then accepting back in the original signature then migrating the F2FS. It is a completely hacky multiple tools needed command line mash of frustration. F2FS is not compatible yet with most of the mainline partition management tools - and it has been a couple of years. F2FS still feels like betaware. There are -no- tools available to shrink an F2FS to spin off to archive.
If the partition were EXT4, it would simple to copy / expand / grow / shrink the partition and could be done with a wide array of GUI based tools.
So - what is the underlying reason we're using F2FS instead of EXT4? Using F2FS removes flexibility and compatibility and feels like way more trouble than it is worth.
Installing the latest available-to-me OS image onto a 64GB SDXC card results in only being able to use/see the first 8GB of the card within the OS. Where we're using apt from Debian repositories for software installs, more space in the rootfs would be a good thing. I can foresee users installing to up to 1TB cards.
Where the frustration hits: Trying to resize or grow the F2FS partition to 'fill the card'. Yes, I figured out how to do it by soft deleting the partition, creating a new bigger partition, formatting to F2FS then accepting back in the original signature then migrating the F2FS. It is a completely hacky multiple tools needed command line mash of frustration. F2FS is not compatible yet with most of the mainline partition management tools - and it has been a couple of years. F2FS still feels like betaware. There are -no- tools available to shrink an F2FS to spin off to archive.
If the partition were EXT4, it would simple to copy / expand / grow / shrink the partition and could be done with a wide array of GUI based tools.
So - what is the underlying reason we're using F2FS instead of EXT4? Using F2FS removes flexibility and compatibility and feels like way more trouble than it is worth.