Final Fantasy 1 & 2 Wonderswan

[Jegriva]

Someone knows how do they run on Wonderboi?

Thanks for answering.

 

[deadlychicken22]

I tried those out about 1.5 years ago and they run just about perfect EXCEPT there was no sound. I don't know if there is sound yet, but when I tried it there was not sound at all.

 

[LOOM]

I tried it 0,5 years ago and still no sound, but it's very playable

 

[reaper79]

I'm still playing them both, once again no sound, and it's very slow. You'll need a high frameskip, but on an RPG, this is acceptable. Oddly enough, I've never played any other wonderswan games. If I remember correctly, quite a few of them are hacked/translated... sort of.

Cheers!

 

[0-bake]

very funny whats defined as "playable".
i tried it with the latest version and it is so far beeing playable....

exactly this is why i don't like these compatibility lists. because "working perfect 100%" means: the game don't freeze or crash after loading

 

[Jegriva]

Thx.

 

[LOOM]

have you tried it on 220mhz? B) it's VERY playable

 

[0-bake]

yes, my GP32 ist stable til about 256MHz
but i started a thread about the word "playable" some time ago. i don't get it, but i know that there are even people who actually watch camera-screened movies on their pc.
they will get eye-cancer one day...

 

[Fishbong]

Why not playing the NES versions? They run perfect on LJ...?

 

[Jegriva]

Because the WSC version is FARsuperior to NES. It's like the PSX or GBA versions.

 

[Goity]

stop moaning. FF1 + 2 are perfectly playable on gp32 at even 133mhz.

 

[Jegriva]

I'm playing at Frameskip 2 and at 156Mhz: 100% (20.0 Fps)

 

[0-bake]

I'm playing at Frameskip 2 and at 156Mhz: 100% (20.0 Fps)

​

100% what? headache?
no, just kidding. i can't play rpg's if going on the map is just chopchopchopchop

 

[Alpha2]

There's a difference between being "playable" and "enjoyable".