DELETED

[bzar]

The f* cases are shipping!

EvilDragon1717 We got a tracking number! It's not yet in the UPS system (always takes some time, even longer in China). Good news, I'll keep you updated!

:lol:

andora2ut4:

 

[bzar]

If the cases are all ok we will send out some units with those sample caes.

 

[r00tw00t]

Great success! Let's say farewell to Mr. Murphy shall we?

 

[Bigun]

EvilDragon1717 We got a tracking number! It's not yet in the UPS system (always takes some time, even longer in China). Good news, I'll keep you updated!

NEGIMA!
可愛い！

 

[dsleaf67]

EvilDragon1717 We got a tracking number! It's not yet in the UPS system (always takes some time, even longer in China). Good news, I'll keep you updated!

Eds Twittered again:

Date: 03/02/2010 Local Time: 20:40 Description: ORIGIN SCAN



Awesome

 

[mindlord]

EvilDragon1717 We got a tracking number! It's not yet in the UPS system (always takes some time, even longer in China). Good news, I'll keep you updated!

Eds Twittered again:

Date: 03/02/2010 Local Time: 20:40 Description: ORIGIN SCAN



Awesome

This is fantastic! I know it's a pain in the ass for ED to twitter every time UPS updates the status, but it sure beats the hell out of us F5ing UPS's site with the tracking number.

Thanks Evil Dragon!

 

[(naw)mcx]

EvilDragon1717 Date: 03/02/2010 Local Time: 23:30 Description: DEPARTURE SCAN

 

[Awakening]

Oooh, this is exciting!

 

[bzar]

 

[mali]

 

[atomicthumbs]

So it's either arriving on February 5, or May 2. Hoorah!

 

[lulzfish]

DD-MM-YYYY: Even sillier than MM-DD-YYYY? Neither of them sort properly like YYYY-MM-DD does.
And where do bra size jokes fit into all this??

 

[Butterman]

MM-DD-YYYY is just another way the USA chooses to be incompatible with the rest of the world. Yes, the international standard is YYYY-MM-DD, but most (almost all) nations use DD-MM-YYYY.

Just like I have no time for imperial measurements, I have no time for MM-DD-YYYY.

 

[Nova]

Day: Month: Year: seems a lot more logical to me than the other ways. I say 5th February 2010. I don't often say February 5th 2010 (Although some people do), and I never say 2010 February 5th.

EDIT: My apologies for going off topic

 

[Loonie]

DD:MM:YYYY and YYYY:MMD at least have some coherent hierarchy. MMD:YYYY is just crap.

 

[Asmo]

Day: Month: Year: seems a lot more logical to me than the other ways. I say 5th February 2010. I don't often say February 5th 2010 (Although some people do), and I never say 2010 February 5th.

Specifying the year first narrows the range to 52 Weeks. Then the month reduces it to 30 days. Then the date nails it. It's logical, just not very Human.

 

[Bigun]

I deal with databases, so the DD-MM-YYYY kinda makes sense to me. The smallest increment of the calendar to the largest.

 

[Gruntfuggly]

YYYY-MM-DD is the most logical, because you can then sort dates as a single number.

 

[Butterman]

I think it depends on how you're using it.

You could argue that what changes most often is the day, so for short term stuff (like planning something next week), making DD-MM-YYYY the most logical. You already know the month and the year...

 

[juniorm33]

In terms of human communication and therefore how it's displayed I believe that DD-MM-YYYY to be the best.
If you only say the 15th, then the current month and year is assumed.
If you need to stipulate the month then you say 15th May, so on.
It may be logical to store it in the backend as YYYYMMDD but I don't think it's logical for it to be displayed that way, as most people don't speak to each other that way.
Sorry for OT.