Actually I just tested at 260 MHz again and the Incas are pulling 3:50:00 They mustn't have charged properly before the first test.imhotep posted on Feb 14 2007 at 06:10 PM said:However, I got some very interesting results with some Inca 2700mAh batteries I purchased a few weeks ago. I wasn't optimistic before purchase as I had never heard of them before.
@200 MHz = 4:46:38 <-- amazing
@260 MHz = 1:40:00 <-- what the??! h34r:
The Incas seem to be alot better than average at stock speed, but considerably worse than average when overclocked
Another Inca fan...joele posted on Mar 3 2007 at 06:26 PM said:Inca 2600mAh
Clock Speed: 260 Mhz
Running Time: 3:25:30
STATISTICS:
Clock Speed: 200 Mhz
Running Time: 6:17:38
Average FPS: 81.68
Current charge: 9%
Initial internal charge: 1023
Current internal charge: 674
STATISTICS:
Clock Speed: 250 Mhz
Running Time: 5:40:00
Average FPS: 101.70
Current charge: 100%
Initial internal charge: 1023
Current internal charge: 977
Any time you see "Zinc Carbon" or the package says "Heavy Duty" but it doesn't also say alakaline, run far far far away, those are cheap, junk batteries that are somehow still being foisted on unsuspecting customers.unclechicken said:Ive been running this application to test normal non-rechargeable batteries.
Im currently running some Philips R6/UM3 Zinc Carbon Longlife batteries.
And that was FRESH FROM THE PACK, first use lol