Search results

  1. R

    iCP2: They're throwing in the towel.

    @Exophase We agree that it was a fraud, not a scam and that Craig's intentions were good, even if his actions weren't. But I don't believe for a second that Craig ever had molds made. No one has ever seen a single case from a mold, nor has Craig ever actually mention them. And what about the...
  2. R

    iCP2: They're throwing in the towel.

    Was the ICP2 a fraud from the outset? Of course it was. I don't believe Craig intended to take our money and never deliver but the project was not in the state represented at launch. The ICP2 was never "ready for mass production now" as claimed. Craig knowingly used dishonesty for financial...
  3. R

    iCP2: They're throwing in the towel.

    I'm not even sure what you mean by that. Unless you're saying you post was not sarcastic. Would you prefer I called it condescending? Either way, we've each made our point, let's move on.
  4. R

    iCP2: They're throwing in the towel.

    Shame you weren't blessed with reading comprehension to match your penchant for sarcasm and mindlessly arguing things to death.
  5. R

    iCP2: They're throwing in the towel.

    Where does he say that's the only reason he can fathom? You're putting words in other people's mouths.
  6. R

    iCP2: They're throwing in the towel.

    Neither is theft and dishonesty.
  7. R

    iCP2: They're throwing in the towel.

    Link - Please read the comments section of the Kickstarter. People are getting pretty pissed at your silence and utter refusal to address any questions. At least three are now taking legal action against you. Try engaging in an actual dialog with the backers and you'll find them much more...
  8. R

    iCP2: They're throwing in the towel.

    I don't believe the talks are happening at all. I'm certain that Craig has blown most or all of the money and is now stringing Link along, just like he did with his backers throughout the project. I know some parts were ordered but I'm sure he won't be able to account for the remaining money for...
  9. R

    iCP2: They're throwing in the towel.

    If they were Craig is the only person who ever saw them or a case made by them. I see no reason to believe molds were created. I also see no reason for Craig to suddenly pipe in now with an apology, albeit one that blames everyone else but himself. Perhaps he's getting pressure from someone...
  10. R

    Openpandora Ltd (UK) Struck off email

    Nice work. It's good to see the system is actually working. So what's next from there?
  11. R

    Openpandora Ltd (UK) Struck off email

    Really!? Grow up and move on.
  12. R

    Openpandora Ltd (UK) Struck off email

    Mate, you're the one with a reading comprehension problem here. Reread WizardStan's posts and mine. If you can't work it out you're beyond my help.  Shouldn't you be off somewhere chastising people for criticizing Craig?
  13. R

    Openpandora Ltd (UK) Struck off email

    @WizardStan Chill the f@ck out. Tell me, what makes you more authoritative on the subject than the lawyer Stuart spoke to? Are you just another armchair lawyer emboldened by the internet or do you have a real reason to question what Stuart has said? @Stuart This isn't the only time I've seen...
  14. R

    Openpandora Ltd (UK) Struck off email

    You're absolutely right, I misread your post. My apologies. Nope, he got it right. A third party cannot change the conditions or cancel a contract between two other parties. It doesn't matter what ED offered or what the conditions were because ED's business and OP LTD UK are two separate legal...
  15. R

    Openpandora Ltd (UK) Struck off email

    @Stuart It was very clear what you were saying. Any other interpretation was just self-serving. You have nothing to apologize for.
  16. R

    Openpandora Ltd (UK) Struck off email

    And that speaks volumes :)
  17. R

    Openpandora Ltd (UK) Struck off email

    Here we go again... @hedwards: Given you have no idea whether Craig has a mental illness, let alone what illness that might be, you're in no better position to comment on Craig's mental condition or capabilities than Stuart is. And he had the tact and intelligence not to. It doesn't matter if...
  18. R

    Openpandora Ltd (UK) Struck off email

    It's beyond ridiculous that unqualified people, none of whom have ever met Craig face to face, are even suggesting a possible mental illness as a reason for his actions. First everyone is a lawyer and now we're all psychologists? Good grief.  And it's ironic that Stuart, the first person to get...
  19. R

    Openpandora Ltd (UK) Struck off email

    Amen. A big company would quickly find themselves in real legal trouble if they screwed over hundreds of people in the way Craig has. The leniency people have shown him isn't admirable, it's absurd. I don't think I've ever witnessed so many people who have been so obviously ripped off defend the...
  20. R

    Openpandora Ltd (UK) Struck off email

    Lets agree to disagree on the small claims option. I think it's a good idea, you don't. You think you know what you're talking about, I'm certain you have no idea. Either way, us arguing here is of no benefit to anyone. But you have to admit, unless you're as stupid as you keep saying I am, that...
Back
Top