Search results

Wally, focus on proper topic,  and is there a reason to double post it here?, here we have topic that is not releaeted with stunts in any aspect.. Go away :D http://boards.openpandora.org/topic/14409-dosbox-ex-ultimate/page-20#entry321308/URL]

Read answer on another topic you posted..

http://wiki.stunts.hu/index.php?title=Download This page states opposite. And since people there are stunts enthusiasts, they should know more about  'behind the scenes' than casual-stunts gamer..

Its perfectly fine for me. But the community must decide wether will help or not. Its crucial decision to start coding something. (from my side..). If anyone wants to see how it could look like fire up dosbox ex and downloader..

New version in repo.. http://repo.openpandora.org/?page=detail&app=dosbox-ex-app

Excellent Notaz. I was never a fan of starcraft back in the days. Now i might change my mind.. :D

Yes, i accept that. Its perfectly fine for me. If the project will not be accepted by community [in the way i proposed], it wont be released. Im not trying to please community for all the costs.. 

You act like perfect politician, _wb_. Instead of answering you're create another question. Im talking about contributing to community by writing apps, and you still trying to flip course of this topic to other [FOSS] track. You know it will not work out..

I understand that coding and releasing application(s) is not sharing and contributing to community enough, _wb_? Of course , you look at it from wrong side. I dont want need help with coding, i can handle it myself. And as i said, if there will be no community involvement the project will die...

Of course. Im aware that. Thats why i would love to talk about what i can do and what community can do. And not what i dont do..

Like i said before, i would like to keep full control of distribution of my code/bin's.  Apart of that, my personal choice of licensing shouldnt be the part of debate in this topic. Its because i'll not convince You , and You will not convince me. And all that talk about OSS is a waste of time...

BTW. I forgot to mention: RTrigger -> open / close screenshot view in bigger window :D

New version in repo: Whats New: - searching list 'by game name' [type something and press enter] - added info-hints for buttons on left - small optimizations - Added Games Count  - Added SD Card Free Space info [to make sure you'll have enough free space to install game..] Screen:  ...

Its not ironic. PD/Free roms doesnt mean that they re GPL'ed. Think about it.  Comradekingu:   I dont understand how not providing the source of the frontend and stating the lisence of the games isnt better for everyone involved?   Oh, again. Same old story. Stuff stays closed. I would...

and no computers.. only consoles/handhelds..  for example atari 8bit / commodore scene is completely overlooked on pdroms.de. Kojote is making awesome work with pdroms.de, but some areas of emulation / retro gaming are overlooked there.. 

because spaces in file name http://repo.openpandora.org/files/pnd/Qemu%20Dos%20Games%20Pack/previews/qemu1.png http://repo.openpandora.org/files/pnd/Qemu Dos Games Pack/previews/qemu1.png

Btw repo is so big right now , so search function would be good idea :D

I would love to add more of this kind goodies into dosbox repo :D

Doubled games removed and new [+8*] free/share/demos games upladed thanks to Gismo and BAFelton.  It includes one extreme hard to find [and free] german game called Helicopter Mission, released in 1993 to promote german army :D I must admit i never heard about it :D...

hint, hint http://boards.openpandora.org/topic/15799-idea-legalroms-market/#entry320727/URL]