Search results

  1. B

    Nubs: 100% Success! (2010 - 11 - 21)

    Of course your're considering it, you said so right here: Even if you really meant the board company, I still would strongly caution at changing something like this still in batch one. There will be additional unforseen delays, because of shipping (will the assembler send things to customers...
  2. B

    Some quick Nubdate ;) (2010 - 11 - 25)

    Do we have an updated schedule from the Board company yet? I believe they (or perhaps you) had promised one.
  3. B

    Nubs: 100% Success! (2010 - 11 - 21)

    Unless I'm mistaken, we were promised multiple times that work on the iCP wouldn't hold up any progress on the Pandora? (i.e. the Pandora comes first.)
  4. B

    wizzley presto and the vampires tomb

    OK, I take back that semi-accusation, then. However, I still stand by "has no one really won it yet?" and that this should be posted somewhere, along with congratulation info.
  5. B

    wizzley presto and the vampires tomb

    Yes. But isn't it strange for a UK-based company to be offering it's prize in USD? Not to accuse anyone of anything, but the only reason that comes to my mind is to mislead about the actual value being offered (the lowest).
  6. B

    wizzley presto and the vampires tomb

    I would also be interested in playing this - I hear the ending is also a hint at a sequel. Two interesting observations, though: They never came anywhere close to their "30 days" (surprise). The webpage for the game *still* lists there as being a $1500 (GBP? EUR? USD?) prize for the first...
  7. B

    Warning: don't leave your Pandora plugged in for too long

    *phew* Much obliged. :)
  8. B

    Warning: don't leave your Pandora plugged in for too long

    So let me verify that I've got this straight: 1) It's bad to continue charging your Pandora once it's at 100%. aka. It's bad to have your Pandora plugged in for too long with a battery. 2) It's bad to have your Pandora plugged in *without* a battery. 3) Putting in the battery while...
  9. B

    Nubs and a Schedule (2010-11-04)

    I beg to differ. Two months ago we were already in another batch of testing, but it still wasn't good enough. The nub company first decided there was something wrong after some more extensive testing which was four (!) months ago. For them to be testing at that point, they must have had good...
  10. B

    Nubs and a Schedule (2010-11-04)

    Well, you did start shipping well over two months ago. In fact, it was almost six! However, I was referring to the "after two months, they're here" comment, which you've been saying for (more than) two years, now.
  11. B

    Nubs and a Schedule (2010-11-04)

    Damnit, ED. You should know better than that. Also, it's been (more than) two years, now, not two months.
  12. B

    Nubs and a Schedule (2010-11-04)

    He's referring to this: Edit: extra quote for clarity.
  13. B

    Nubs and a Schedule (2010-11-04)

    Well, it does depend on local regulations, but of course emails can be legally binding. It's certainly at least as binding as an oral contract - except you have proof of it for later on. Either way, OPT certainly insinuated that they had a legally binding contract (e.g. email) and that there...
  14. B

    Nubs and a Schedule (2010-11-04)

    Amusing as the sheer foolishness of posting a photo of someone, arms crossed, standing in front of a flag twice your height is, I'd still be interested in getting back to the original question. What is their punishment for failing to make the self-imposed deadline? Because if there wasn't...
  15. B

    Nubs and a Schedule (2010-11-04)

    We don't know. At one point OPT suggested (threatened) that they would release this information, in an attempt to shame the company, but then they didn't actually do so. Perhaps that was enough to make the company step up its game, or perhaps it was all just a show. Interestingly the...
  16. B

    Nubs and a Schedule (2010-11-04)

    Signed was perhaps too strict a term. But they did have it "in writing" as stated here. Legally binding, and all that jazz. The real point is that OPT then said (several times) that it would be enough to hold them to it, if they didn't make it. What should they do in return? Unclear. Accept a...
  17. B

    Nubs and a Schedule (2010-11-04)

    Link, Of course it matters. Because if they told us they had 2000 3 weeks ago and didn't *actually* have them done, why should we believe it if they tell us that now? More than that, it's because we have a signed agreement saying that they would be complete by the 18th. The whole point of...
  18. B

    Nubs and a Schedule (2010-11-04)

    Was he the one who made the original promise that they would all be done by Oct 18th? Because I look at that timeline, and see "Third 1000 PCBs: Production: Nov. 5th - Nov 30th" which is almost a month and a half later than originally promised (*if* they keep on schedule). You said that there...
  19. B

    Nubs and a Schedule (2010-11-04)

    Hmm. I hadn't looked at that closely enough before, I guess. Then I'll ask the question a different way. Why are they *still* testing the first 1000 boards Nov 1st -12th when they told us that "Over 1000 boards have already been tested (well, except for the nubs)." Similarly, why are they...
  20. B

    One video per day - Discussions

    Oh, I do realize that. I see what kinds of odd hours you're posting, and how little sleep you get. I'm amazed, as is. But if your gp2x.de store is the one selling the Pandoras, doesn't the packing shipping count as part of that work? Plus, you're doing the 8-10 hours of work right now, anyway...
Back
Top